Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Dhaka Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 151

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)229; 2001(57)DRJ507; 2002(64)ECC353; 2001RLR211

for a period of thirty days from the date of sentence. In this contention Section 151 of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is of significance as it states that every term of imprisonment or

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … the Commanding Officer and charges were read out to him. He was then cautioned in terms of Regulation 151 of Regulations, Navy, Part II. This was on 12-6-1992. Thereafter on 15-6-1992, the Commanding Officer put up the

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

supervision and is equivalent to confinement in the sense in which it is used in subsection (2) of Section 151 of the Act.23. Thus, it cannot be said that under the provisions of the Navy Act including the … applicable in view of the fact that the petitioners are to be proceeded with Court-Martial proceedings under the Navy Act.5. The learned Counsel for the petitioners Mr. Ramanaimirthy for Sri Vasudeva Rao contends that under Section 4 of

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash … (1) SCT 471] (vi) Lt. Gen S.K. Dahiya V. Union of India and Ors [2007 Mil LJ Del 151] 11. Learned counsel has also alleged that serious malafides and discrimination in treatment that a personnel from Air

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

the Army Act would equally govern the person sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment by the court-martial under the Navy Act, 1957 (for short “the 1957 Act”) and the Air Force Act. The two-Judge Bench referred to the divergence of … sentence shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed upon him.”15. Similarly, Section 151 of the 1957 Act which deals with commencement of sentence has been amended by Act 23 of 2005

Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2393

when commit any offence are dealt with the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … Summary General Court Martial was held according to the provisions of Rules 151 to 165 of the Army Rules, 1954 and the petitioner was afforded … Martial for the commission of offence of murder of Lance Nk. Partap Singh.4. The petitioner was chargesheeted under Section 69 of the Army Act for committing a civil offence under Section 302 of the Ranbir Penal Code.

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Army Act would equally govern the person sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment by the court- martial under the Navy Act, 1957 (for short “the 1957 Act”) and the Air Force Act. The two-Judge Bench referred to the divergence of … shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed upon him.” 15. Similarly, Section 151 of the 1957 Act which deals with commencement of sentence has been amended by Act 23 of 2005

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … copies of the charge sheet and statement of witness supporting the charge sheet which was voilative of Regulation 151 and vitiates the trial in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v.

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer or other employee of a … was issued to the first respondent, which is produced at Exhibit E-6/pg. 151, which shows that the pensionary benefits as per the details in Annexure … the preliminary issue that the complaint was maintainable since respondent No. 1 was a 'workman', as defined in section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'I.D. Act') or an employee as defined in clause

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M.K.C. Kutty

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR332

respondent-plaintiff joined Central Railway (the then G.I.P.) as wireless operator on October 11, 1945, after serving in the Navy, and was confirmed therein on January 1, 1946. By an order dated February 24, 1972, he was compulsorily … unlawfully dismissed in 1949, which dismissal was declared void on January 28, 1957 in Suit No. 488 of 1953. He was posted to an inconvenient … of the Specific Relief Act. It is equally well-settled that Court has inherent powers to grant injunction under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, even if a particular case does not fall under Section 94 read