Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 150 · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … 0730 hrs to 1330 hrs with 2 days full day i.e. Monday and Friday wherein working hours are 1500-1600 hrs. In addition, to the morning, also night flight on 2 designated days i.e. Monday and Thursday and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2012

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-2012

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … the sailor was recalled under Exhibit P-29 from leave due to service requirement.13. P.W.7 - Lt Cdr (SDREG) CL Jha speaks about Exhibit P-33 - Genform No.1170/S dated 26th July 1998 on INS Netaji Subhas relating to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2003

C. Gupta Vs. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Amended) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR575; [2004(101)FLR1109]; (2004)ILLJ952Bom

to the Air Force Act, 1950(45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957);(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of … of claim for the reasons mentioned therein, the appellant claimed to be a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as his work was of 'skilled, technical and clerical nature, apart … the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) by his Order of Reference No. CL/IDE/AJD/2A/G-772(84) referred the matter for adjudication.(g) Consequently, in 1985, the present appellant filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 03 2008

Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … hours a day for which he was paid a sum of Rs. 150/- p.m., and as he was entitled to work elsewhere as well, revealed … dated 10th September 1998 held that the claimant before it, was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the 'Act') as he had worked only as a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1996

Philips India Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

to Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the Police Service or as an officer or other … proviso (ii) of s. 10(10B) cannot be applied by the employer to bring its case in an exemption section and then not deducting tax at source. The employer cannot attach a meaning to an expression, which is … to be a capital receipt.21. The expression "workman" has been defined in cl. (c) of the Expln.to s. 10(10B) r/w s. 2(s) of the Industrial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2003

State of Gujarat Vs. Chauhan Ramjibhai Karsanbhai

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 6 and 18; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR347]; (2004)1GLR885

Force Act, 1950 [XLV of 1950 ] or the Army Act, 1950 [ XLVI of 1950], or the Navy Act, 1957 [ LXII of 1957], or[ii] who is employed in the police service or as as officer or the … appointed as Apprentice under the Apprentices Act, 1961. Learned AGP Mr. Dave submitted that the workman appointed under Section 6 of the Apprentices Act on date 23rd May, 1989 upto 22nd May, 1990 for a period of … definition of 'workman' contained in S.2[s] of the I.D. Act. The definition Cl.[s] of S.2 of the I.D. Act expressly includes an 'apprentice'. Section 2[s]

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2020

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-07-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … B N W/O NAGENDRA SWAMY B N AGED ABOUT30YEARS STAFF No.213247 # 150 BASAVESWARA NILAYA11H CROSS3D MAIN, BAPUJI NAGAR, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 026.23. … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1961

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-22-1961

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him, … Pp. 366 U. S. 414 -415. ___ Ct. Cl.___, 181 F. Supp. 668, reversed and remanded. MR.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1975

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-25-1975

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … (1950); In re Grimley, 137 U. S. 147 , 137 U. S. 150 (1890). But this general rule carries with it its own qualification -- … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2005

Shri Mamraj Vs. Management of Shanti Developers and Promoters (i) Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT355; [2005(106)FLR703]; (2005)IIILLJ114Del; 2006(1)SLJ369(Delhi)

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii)who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee or … that the reference was not maintainable as the claimant/petitioner herein was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Section 2(s) of the Act reads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial