Advanced Search Results

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … by Court Martial, the Connanding Officer ordered investigation on 29-5-1992 of the case afresh as required by Regulation 149 of Regulations, Navy Part II. Thereafter on 30-5-1992 the sailor was released from close custody, but was required

Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2393

when commit any offence are dealt with the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … a mandatory provision has been violated. One may usefully refer to Rule 149 of the Army Rules. The High Court should not have allowed the … Martial for the commission of offence of murder of Lance Nk. Partap Singh.4. The petitioner was chargesheeted under Section 69 of the Army Act for committing a civil offence under Section 302 of the Ranbir Penal Code.

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … a General Court-Martial, pursuant to which the petitioner had been found guilty of charges under Section 304 and Section 149 of the IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of six years and cashiering. The first question which was

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … 2, 12 and 14 was not provided to the petitioner in violation of Regulation 169 read with Regulation 149, Regulations Navy Part II.(iii) The TJA ruled that the head of the organization can certify copies of the

Ex-surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Navy Act - Sections 81(1)(b) and 82(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354

Reported in : 1998(1)MhLj220

was found guilty under section 354, Indian Penal Code and under Sections 68, 77(2) and 74 of the Navy Act, 1957 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 24 calendar months. He was also dismissed with disgrace from the Naval … Officer by virtue of Rules 24 and 25 of the Army Rules has not been provided under Rule 149 of the Navy Rules. As far as Navy Rule 149 is concerned, it is the regulation pertains to

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

by the Commanding Officer INS Circars for the trial of the applicant by the Court Martial under Regulation 149 of Regulations for the Navy, Part-II (Statutory). After investigation, a Court Martial was convened on 16th July 1999. … thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … respondent no. 4, in violation of Regulation 148(5) Regs Navy Part II (Statutory). A purported investigation under Regulation 149, Regs Navy Part II (Statutory) commenced against him on 13.12.2008 which was carried out by Capt (TS) S.K.

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … benefits, which was dismissed. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that ordering investigation under Regulation 149 of the Regulations is prescribed in Chapter V and the Regulations for board of inquiry are prescribed under

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … Officer Commanding Eastern Fleet was ordered to carry out an investigation into the incident in terms of Regulation 149 of the Regulations of Navy on 16.3.2004. (h) Circumstantial letter, Charge Sheet and related documents as per Regulation

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … 8th of November, 1990 to 3rd December, 1990. It is complained that this was in violation of Regulation 149 of the Navy Regulations (Part - II) which envisages recording of the complete summary of evidence before an