Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 147 · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.015 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 2022

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2022

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … where three naval officers were arrested for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 307, 326 and 427 read with Section 149 of the … a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731, the High Court has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 1994

Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to … undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. All the accused persons were also convicted for an offence under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment. Major Singh was also convicted for an offence under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2017

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society, Vs. Siddappa G Namba,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jun-02-2017

Subject : Education

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … only regarding the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to decide such applications of the respondent - workmen under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’).2. The issue involved before the Labour Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 22 1961

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-22-1961

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him, … pp. 2823-4; 5 Williston, Contracts (1936 ed.) § 1477; 5 Corbin, Contracts (1951 ed.) § 1127, pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1984

Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 2(15), 5, 22, 44 and 46; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147

Reported in : (1985)47CTR(AP)229; [1986]158ITR259(AP)

the truth of the representations before the authorities at a later stage. 14. In CIT v. Army and Navy Stores Ltd. : [1957]31ITR959(Bom) it was held that having taken a benefit by a certain representation, the assessee … this submission. The above cited case is a case in which proceedings were initiated by the Department under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the incomes of the three ladies (one of them

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1981

Ram Gopal Neotia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-20-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)1ITD160(Kol.)

the assessee were not competent, the departmental representative has relied on the following decisions: CIT v. Army & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959 (Bom.), Jivatlal Purtupshi v. CIT [1967] 65 ITR 261 at page 267 … of returns in response to notices under Section 139(2)/148 or under the corresponding section of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessees have explained that they could not file the returns or delay occurred in the filing … the assessments of the assessee for the aforesaid four years under Section 147(a). The reassessments for the first three years were completed under Section 144/147(a).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1981

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … , 370 U. S. 655 (1962); Montclair v. Ramsdell, 107 U. S. 147 , 107 U. S. 152 (1883). We can infer, therefore, that by … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2006

Garcetti Vs. Ceballos

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-30-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

see Willis v. Department of Agriculture, 141 F. 3d 1139, 1143 (CA Fed. 1998); Horton v. Department of Navy, 66 F. 3d 279, 282 (CA Fed. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U. S. 1176 (1996), or for statements … See Pickering, supra, at 568. If the answer is no, the employee has no First Amendment cause of action based on the employer’s reaction to the speech. See Connick , supra , at 147. If the answer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1959

Rajendra Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-1959

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 221, 222, 223, 225, 236, 237, 238, 238(1), 423, 439 and 535; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 405, 406 and 420

Reported in : AIR1960All387; 1960CriLJ857

those of the present case. In the case of Surendra Pal Singh 1957 All LJ 147 : (AIR 1957 All 122) this Court simply followed … a married woman, which she was not, and to be the sister of the fiancee of a certain navy officer, who did not exist, became a customer of L., that one day she told him that her … any legal contract, express or implied which he has made touching the discharge of trust. There are two acts, either of which amounts to breach of trust, (1) of dishonestly misappropriating and (2) of dishonestly using in … ORDERM.C. Desai, J.1. The applicants, who are brothers, have been convicted under Section 406, I. P. C. It has been found against them that they

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1977

Mathur Aviation Vs. Lt. Governor, and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-10-1977

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ255Del

such person:(i) who i3 subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 19i4, or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … Dalip K. Kapur, J.1. On 17th August, 1972, under Sections 10(1)(d) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1957, a reference was made to the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi of an industrial dispute said to exist between the … Dalip K. Kapur, J.1. On 17th August, 1972, under Sections 10(1)(d) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1957, a reference was … and Shambhu Nath Vaid v. Labour Court Amritsar and Ors. (1959) F.J.R. 147. The first of these cases was concerned with a notice issued under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial