Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 146 · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 1960

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … of an offence pending the conclusion of the trial. Sub-sec(1) of S. 146 states that when the trial before any Court Martial is concluded, the … Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2013

Naib-subedar Sethurathinam Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Feb-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

or involved in such findings under the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be; or … Officers after the prescribed period of retention in terms of Army Rule 146 and Para 592 of Regulations for the Army 1987. The respondents would … have been grave violations such as pre-trial custody not being set off which is violative of Army Act Section 169-A, non-compliance of Supreme Courts order, not passing any order on the post-confirmation petition and illegally destroying the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2004

Vinesh Kumar Mehta S/O Shiv NaraIn Mehta Vs. Presiding Officer Labour ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 6I, 6N, 6P, 6Q and 33C(2); Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC680; [2005(104)FLR338]

the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … U.P., Kanpur- respondent No. 1 respondent No. 1 in Adjudication Case No. 146 of 1994 by which the following reference with regard to termination of … He pleaded that his termination was illegal, null and void as it was brought about in violation of Sections6-I, 6-N, 6-P and-6-Q of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.3. The employers took a stand before the Labour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 10 2026

Ex-Surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy vs Shri Devender Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and under Section 68, 74 and 77(2) of The Navy Act, 1957, which culminated in Appellant being sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 24 months, vide Order dated 29.11.1995. Pursuant … filed with a long delay of 1470 days, beyond the prescribed period of limitation. An additional delay of 146 days occurred in re-filing the SLP, after removal of defects.16. The SLP got dismissed by the Supreme Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … to 97 deal with power of Court-Martial, constitution of disciplinary courts etc. Chapter XII comprising Sections 98 to 146 deal with the procedure of Court-Martial. Chapter XV comprising Sections 160 and 161 deal with Judicial Review of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1959

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-29-1959

Subject : Education

the design of a rocket launcher, both of which were produced by ERCO and long used by the Navy. During the post-World War II period, petitioner was given security clearances on three occasions. [ Footnote 1 ] … manufactured materials for national defense. Report of the Commission on Government Security, 1957, S.Doc.No.64, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 236. During World War II, the War … S. 508 Hannegan v. Esquire, 327 U. S. 146 , 327 U. S. 156 ; Wong Yang … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1963

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-18-1963

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sixth Amendments are "preserved to every one accused of crime who is not attached to the army, or navy, or militia in actual service." Id. at 71 U. S. 123 . [ Footnote 19 ] "[I]f society … not a citizen. Held: The judgments are affirmed. Pp. 372 U. S. 146 -186. 1. Although Mendoza-Martinez amended his complaint so as to add a … relief in Federal District Courts, which rendered judgments declaring that the relevant statutes, § 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, are unconstitutional. Mendoza-Martinez' … from denying his citizenship subsequently. Pp. 372 U. S. 155 -158. 3. Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1987

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-18-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … course of activity incident to service." 340 U.S. at 340 U. S. 146 . The court found, however, that the evolution of the doctrine since … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1960

Hannah Vs. Larche

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

Subject : Right to Information

the joint resolution confer- the successful attack upon Pearl Hawaii the part of the United States Army or Navy tion of any evidence that re- the subpoena power upon the Com- ring the subpoena power upon the … 420 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Syllabus The Civil Rights Act of 1957 created in the Executive Branch of the Government a Commission on Civil Rights to investigate written, … legislation under the Fifteenth Amendment. P. 363 U. S. 452 . 5. Section 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act is not applicable to hearings conducted … Special Senate Committee to Investigate Lobby- ing Activities, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1469. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ewm: [ Footnote 2/1 ] This Appendix describes the Rules of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1981

Ram Gopal Neotia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-20-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)1ITD160(Kol.)

the assessee were not competent, the departmental representative has relied on the following decisions: CIT v. Army & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959 (Bom.), Jivatlal Purtupshi v. CIT [1967] 65 ITR 261 at page 267 … to the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1959-60, we find that application of the assessee under Section 146 to set aside the ex parte assessment of the assessee for that year was rejected by the ITO. … under Section 139(2)/148 or under the corresponding section of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessees have explained that they could not file the returns

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial