Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 145 · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 07 2009

Kanwardeepsingh Harbansingh Bedi Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3), 3(13), 34 to 76, 77(1), 78, 78(1) and 93(1); Evidence Act - Sections 145; Army Act - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Naval Discipline Act; Indian Navi (Discipline) Act, 1934; Air Force Act; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 192, 193, 197(2), 209, 227, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 374(2), 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549 and 549(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 304A and 381; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3 to 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 2010CriLJ315

materially different from the scheme of Sections 125 and 126 of the Army Act.11. Section 3(3) of the Navy Act, 1957, defines the term 'Civil offence' and it means an offence triable by a court of ordinary criminal jurisdiction … previous statements were used by the defence to confront the prosecution witnesses in the court as permitted under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act and Judge Advocate Commander (PW 5) was one of the prosecution witnesses, who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1999

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … 1150Rs. 3.65Rs. 1151 to 1250Rs. 3.70Rs. 1251 to 1350Rs. 3.75Rs. 1351 to 1450Rs. 3.80Rs, 1451 to 1550Rs. 3.85Rs. 1551 to 1650Rs. 3.90Rs. 1651 to 1750Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2007

Chandra Mohan Shukla Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act. 1957 (62 of 1957). and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law. relating to … used for the purpose of contradicting a witness or impeaching the credibility of a witness in terms of Section 145 of the Evidence Act.26. Thus, the scheme of the Army Act and the Army Rules, if carefully read,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 1960

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … end. sub-sec.(2) of S. 123 states that whenever a Court Martial is dissoved, the accused may be retried. Section 145 empowers the Court Martial to make such order as it thnks fit for the proper custody of property

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … value of the constitutional guarantee involved." Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 145 (1968), and Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 194 (1968), are illustrative … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1976

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-24-1976

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … would come with it. While, under Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 145 (1968), such a right would presumably not obtain in cases of summary … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1960

K.M. Nanavati Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-05-1960

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 5 and 26 - Order XLI, Rule 5 - Order XLV, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1961SC112; (1961)63BOMLR221; 1961CriLJ173; [1961]1SCR497

he was ready and willing to take the accused innaval custody as defined in s. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, in which custody hewould continue to be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall inexercise of … limitation, unlike the power ofthe Supreme Court contained in Arts 136, 142, 145 and other Articles of theConstitution. Hence, what was once a prerogative of … law on the subject as it obtains in India sincethe Code of Criminal Procedure was enacted in 1898. Section 401 of the Codegives power to the executive to suspend the execution of the sentence or remitthe whole

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1960

Hannah Vs. Larche

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

Subject : Right to Information

the joint resolution confer- the successful attack upon Pearl Hawaii the part of the United States Army or Navy tion of any evidence that re- the subpoena power upon the Com- ring the subpoena power upon the … 420 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Syllabus The Civil Rights Act of 1957 created in the Executive Branch of the Government a Commission on Civil Rights to investigate written, … the Government, 67 Stat. 143; (10) Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 67 Stat. 145. [ Footnote 2/3 ] If the relevant statute makes no reference to … legislation under the Fifteenth Amendment. P. 363 U. S. 452 . 5. Section 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act is not applicable to hearings conducted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1987

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-18-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … those provided by most workmen's compensation statutes," id. at 340 U. S. 145 , but the recovery of benefits is "swift [and] efficient," Stencel Aero … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1970

Moragne Vs. States Marine Lines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-15-1970

Subject : Land Acquisition

an alternative ground, which is independently sufficient. In that case, which arose from a collision between a Royal Navy submarine and a private vessel, the Crown sought to recover from the owners of the private vessel the … Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U. S. 130 , 388 U. S. 145 (1967) (opinion of HARLAN, J.). Her challenge to The Tungus is properly … THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner is not foreclosed from bringing this action under federal maritime law, based on unseaworthiness, for the wrongful death within state territorial waters of her husband. … High Seas Act, 41 Stat. 537, 46 U.S.C. § 761 et seq. Section 1 of that Act provides that: "Whenever the death of a person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial