Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 143 · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … the president or the trial judge advocate; (d) on the making of a report under sub-section (2) of section 143. (2) whenever a court-martial is dissolved by virtue of sub-section (1) the accused may be retried.” 21. As

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2022

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2022

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … case where three naval officers were arrested for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 307, 326 and 427 read with Section 149 of … a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731, the High Court has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2006

Gujarat Rajya Police Inspectorassociation Vs. State of Gujarat and anr ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-09-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 6, 6(1), 220(2A) and 408(1); ;National Security Act; ;Army Act, 1950; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Police Force (Restriction of Rights) Amendment Rules, 1970 - Rules 3, 8 and 9; ;Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Rules, 1966; ;Police Forces (Restrictions of Rights) Amendment Rules, 1967; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 33, 226, 227 and 311

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1399

in Article 33 of the Constitution, in the Army Act 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 and the Navy Act, 1957 provision has been made for the restriction or abrogation of the rights conferred by Part III of the … Byles J in Cooper v. Wandsworth Board of Works (NS) 180 : 143 ER 414 is apposite. The decision in the(1863) 14 CB last mentioned … Force (Restriction of Rights) Amendment Rules, 1970 made in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966. The matter was, therefore, adjourned so as to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 01 2002

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (47th Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19 and 25

authority under the Army Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 … thereafter, to the rank of Head Constable. While he was attached to 143 BN. BSF which was stationed at Malda, on 10.8.1990 he along with … is charged with :-BSF Act Abetment of commissions of an offence by a public servant Sec. 46 under Section 7 punishable under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.In that, they while on OP duty at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1984

Ved Prakash Gupta Vs. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(i)(c)

Reported in : AIR1984SC914; [1984(48)FLR417]; (1984)ILLJ546SC; 1984(1)SCALE474; (1984)2SCC569; [1984]3SCR169; 1984(1)SLJ569(SC); 1984(16)LC523(SC)

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … of the dismissal of the appellant to the Labour Court, Faridabad in Reference No. 143 of 1980 under Section 10(i)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act.' The Labour Court framed the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2024

M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. A.s. Raghavendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-2024

Subject : MRTP

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … OnLine SC858; Shankarbhai Nathalal Prajapati v Maize Products, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 143; Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Private Limited v Official Liquidator of Mahendra Petrochemicals Limited … annual package totalling Rs.22,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Two Lakhs) and thus, was not a “workman”, within the 3 meaning of Section 2(s)1, ID Act, the “appropriate Government”2 [herein, the Government of Karnataka]. referred the dispute to the Labour Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

R.K. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14, 226 and 226(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 11(2) and 23; Navy Service Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 235 to 239 and 269(1A)

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR434; 2002(4)BomCR567; (2002)4BOMLR246; [2002(94)FLR956]; 2002(3)MhLj561

being Civil Writ Petition No. 6470 of 1999 inter alia challenging the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and Regulation No. 269(1A) of the Navy Service Regulations, 1965 as being unconstitutional on the ground that they … Supreme Court in Makhan Singh Tarsikka v. The State of Punjab : 1964CriLJ217 . In re: Under Article 143 of the Constitution of India, : AIR1965SC745 and L Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors., :

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1999

Bokaro Steel Plant of Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Presiding Offi ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-23-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1986

such person-i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 orii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, … work has to be looked into. It is relevant to quote paragraph 143 of the said judgment which runs as follows:'143. The dominant nature test;a) … statements. The management in the written statement took a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the reference under Section 10(1)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground that the P.T.I.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1961

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-22-1961

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … et seq. [ Footnote 11 ] 56 Stat. 143. [ Footnote 12 ] See Article 57, Uniform … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1960

Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-1960

Subject : Land Acquisition

entirely inapposite. Page 361 U. S. 285 Those cases permitted trial by courts-martial of paymasters' clerks in the navy. The Court found that such a position was "an important one in the machinery of the navy," the … ] See Army Regulations 600-201, 20 June 1956, as changed 15 March 1957, and Army Regulations 624-200, 19 May 1958, as changed 1 July 1959. … (1957), was binding as to all classes of persons included within the section and that each class was nonseverable. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927. … Winthrop, Military Law and Precedents (2d ed. 1896) 143. See also Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2, … Army and stationed in Berlin, was convicted by a general court-martial on a plea of guilty to three acts of sodomy. While serving his five-year sentence, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial