Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 142 · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … given an opportunity to tender explanation under Section 59 and there was disobedience of order and prosecution under Section 142 was launched. In those circumstances, the Supreme Court quashed the prosecution order on the ground that extemment order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2026

Lt. Col. Pandappa Kotagi vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

otherwise requires,-(o) “service matters”, in relation to the persons subject to the ArmyAct, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the … is clear that prayers (b) to (h) are amenable to the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal1 under Section 142 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 20073 read with Section 2(o) of the AFT Act.3. We have heard

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1960

K.M. Nanavati Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-05-1960

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 5 and 26 - Order XLI, Rule 5 - Order XLV, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1961SC112; (1961)63BOMLR221; 1961CriLJ173; [1961]1SCR497

he was ready and willing to take the accused innaval custody as defined in s. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, in which custody hewould continue to be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall inexercise of … judicial powers of this Court,with particular reference to its powers under Art. 142 of the Constitution. 2. For the determination of the constitutional issue raised … law on the subject as it obtains in India sincethe Code of Criminal Procedure was enacted in 1898. Section 401 of the Codegives power to the executive to suspend the execution of the sentence or remitthe whole

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2024

Cdr Seema Chaudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-26-2024

Subject : Education

issued by the Union Government on 9 October 1991 and 6 November 1998 under Section 9(2) of the Navy Act. Moreover, this Court held that the policy decision of the Union Government dated 25 February 1999 would govern … envisaged in the Notifications issued by the Union Government on 9-10-1991 and 6-11-1998 under Section 9(2) of the 1957 Act. 109.2. By and as a result of the policy decision of the Union Government in the Ministry … men officers to PCs. In exercise of the power conferred by Article 142 of the Constitution, we direct that as a one-time measure, SSC officers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1997

United States Vs. Alaska

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-19-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

States Coast and Geodetic Survey resumed charting Dinkum Sands as a lowtide elevation, based on observations of a Navy vessel made the prior year. It is undisputed that one of the members of the Baseline Committee persuaded … United States did not transfer such lands to Alaska at statehood. The 1957 Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife application to create a wildlife refuge … Contracting Co., 302 U. S. 134 , 141, 142 (1937) ("[The Enclave Clause] governs those cases where … United States and Alaska over the ownership of submerged lands along the State's Arctic Coast. The Alaska Statehood Act expressly provides that the federal Submerged Lands Act applies to Alaska. The latter Act entitles Alaska to submerged … supply that would necessarily exist 3 beneath both submerged lands and uplands. Section l1(b) of the Alaska Statehood Act, which noted that the United States

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1975

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-25-1975

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … [ Footnote 25 ] See Augenblick v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 131, 142, 377 F.2d 586, 592 (1967), rev'd on other grounds, 393 U. S. … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1987

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-18-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … -306 (1947)) (emphasis added; citations omitted). See id. at 340 U. S. 142 (finding relevant "the status of both the wronged and the wrongdoer") (emphasis … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1960

Hannah Vs. Larche

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

Subject : Right to Information

the joint resolution confer- the successful attack upon Pearl Hawaii the part of the United States Army or Navy tion of any evidence that re- the subpoena power upon the Com- ring the subpoena power upon the … 420 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Syllabus The Civil Rights Act of 1957 created in the Executive Branch of the Government a Commission on Civil Rights to investigate written, … legislation under the Fifteenth Amendment. P. 363 U. S. 452 . 5. Section 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act is not applicable to hearings conducted … to the Office of Temporary Controls by Exec.Order No. 9809, 11 Fed.Reg. 14281, which in turn was terminated by Exec.Order No. 9841, 12 Fed.Reg. 2645.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1958

Public Utilities Comm'n of California Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-03-1958

Subject : Land Acquisition

expressed by Congress, contingent upon carrier ability to provide safe, adequate, and efficient transportation. [ Footnote 7 ]" Navy regulations provide that, when applicable freight rates "appear excessive," they "may be negotiated for more equitable rates." [ … 8012(f), respectively. [ Footnote 5 ] Armed Services Procurement Regulations, 32 CFR, 1957, Cum.Pocket Supp., § 1.108 et seq. [ Footnote 6 ] Id., § … was an "actual controversy" between the United States and the Commission within the meaning of the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Pp. 355 U. S. 536 -539. (b) In the circumstances of this case, the … U. S. 535 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 530 of the California Public Utilities Code, Cal.Stat.1955, c. 1966, provides in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2012

Ministry of Defence (Respondent) Vs. Ab and Others (Appellants)

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-14-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

prior to 23 December 2001. He had performed his National Service as an engineer mechanic with the Royal Navy and in 1956 had served aboard HMS Diana near the Monte Bello islands when its function had been … served with the RAF as an aircraft fitter on Christmas Island in 1957 when detonations had taken place off Malden Island, and again in 1958, … set time running. Indeed, in paras 140 and 142, Lord Phillips suggests that, although the appellants may … and Lord Kerr to the meaning of the word "knowledge" in sections 11(4) and 14(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 ("the Act") is misconceived and would throw the practical application of the subsections into disarray. I also … Hale and Lord Kerr to the meaning of the word "knowledge" in sections 11(4) and 14(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 ("the Act") is misconceived

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial