Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash … (ii) Lt. Col. Prithi Pal Singh Bedi etc.etc. Vs. Union of India and Ors. etc.etc. [1982 (3) SCC 140] (iii) R.P. Shukla V. Central Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Lucknow [AIR 1996 MP 233} (iv) 1987 Labour law cases C

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … Mechanical WG VII/CPVI Assistant time Diploma - Electronics Rs.4620- in 135-5970- Engineering+1 140- year 8350+admis apprenticeship sible training allowances 2 Technician ITI + 1 Year … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act 1950 or sentence of death in terms of Section 71 (1) (a) of the Navy Act, 1957, coupled with the factum that the decision of the Tribunal is final in terms of Section 29 of … to step in and do so. Else, the possibility of orders and directions of all49 (2024) 7 SCC 140 50 (2023) 9 SCC 433 51 (2016) 3 SCC 619 52 (2016) 4 SCC 179 W.P.(C) 12769/2024 Page

Boumediene Vs. Bush

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

precedential value of the Court’s previous opinion in In re Ross , 140 U. S. 453 (1891), which the Reid Court understood as holding that … Although the detainee is assigned a “Personal Representative” to assist him during CSRT proceedings, the Secretary of the Navy’s memorandum makes clear that person is not the detainee’s lawyer or even his “advocate.” See App. to Pet. … Government’s motion to dismiss, holding that the detainees had no rights that could be vindicated in a habeas action. In the second, the judge held that the detainees had due process rights. While appeals were pending, Congress … the instant cases, that were pending at the time of its enactment. Section §7(b)’s effective date provision undoubtedly applies to habeas actions, which, by definition,

Solorio Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

provides little support for O'Callahan. For example, in 1800, Congress enacted Articles for the Better Government of the Navy, which provided that "[a]ll offences committed by persons belonging to the navy while on the shore shall be … Congress." Burns v. Wilson, 346 U. S. 137 , 346 U. S. 140 (1953) (plurality opinion) (footnote omitted). See also Coleman v. Tennessee, supra, at … our earlier decision in O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U. S. 258 (1969). While petitioner Richard Solorio was on active duty in the Seventeenth Coast Guard District in Juneau, Alaska, he sexually abused two young daughters of fellow … Armed Forces, Art. I, § 8, cl. 14, appears in the same section as do the provisions granting Congress authority, inter alia, to regulate commerce

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … in Burns v. Wilson, 346 U. S. 137 , 346 U. S. 140 (1953): "[T]he rights of men in the armed forces must perforce be … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

murdered Parkman, or later, when evil-disposed persons violated her laws in Lowell? Did they require the Army and Navy and martial law? And, sir, because a midnight murderer is sometimes found in the South, it should not … found in that report. Section 131(c) of the Act of September 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 634, 637, amended 42 U.S.C. § 1971 by adding a … amended by §§ 17, 18, Act of May 31, 1870, 16 Stat. 140, 144. [ Footnote 31 ] The right involved in the Classic case … APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Under R.S. § 1979, derived from § 1 of the "Ku Klux Act" of April 20, 1871, petitioners (six Negro children and their parents) brought an action in a Federal District

United States Vs. United Continental Tuna Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

caused jurisdictional difficulties. For example, in Continental Cas. Co. v. United States, 140 Ct.Cl. 500, 156 F.Supp. 942 (1957), the Court of Claims had held … of the Department, the commanding officer, or certain other persons. In time of war, the Secretary of the Navy can obtain a stay of any suit brought under the Public Vessels Act when it appears that prosecution … the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: it deleted the language in the jurisdictional section of the Suits in Admiralty Act requiring that a vessel be "employed as a merchant vessel." We have