Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 14 · Page 1 of about 348 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 22 2006

Gurumukh Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-22-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 14; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 78, 82, 85, 95, 278, 279 and 280; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR95; 2007(1)BomCR893

to be enlisted initially as a sailor for a period of 10 years. Under the provisions of the Navy Act, 1957, Section 14, Officers and Sailors shall be liable to serve in the Indian Navy or the Indian Naval Reserved Force

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2000

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … Delhi High Court in the impugned judgment. Indeed in the Order dated 14-2-2000, this Court recorded the submission of Mr. Soli J Sorabjee, learned Attorney

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are … writ petition cannot, ipso facto, be transferred to the Tribunal, keeping in view the provisions as contained under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, which clearly excludes the jurisdiction of supreme court and High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 2005

The British India Corporation Ltd., Cawnpore Woollen Mills Branch Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 20A and 25G; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 34 and 38; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Army Act, 1960; Air force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 311; Industrial Law

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1511; [2006(109)FLR460]

the Army Act, 1960 (46 of 1950) or the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or [the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … Act. The service of the plaintiff-respondent being within a contract, it could not be enforced being barred under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act and the relief for declaration, as provided under Section 38, thus, could not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … the statutory authority to decide forfeiture or the grant of these benefits is the competent authority under Rule 14(5) and 15 of the Army Rules. Therefore, there is no question of applying non-statutory pensionary regulations to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2010

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jun-30-2010

Subject : Right to Information

state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash … System Officer and Joint Director (Coord. and Admn.) in Directorate of Naval Operations. It is alleged that on 14.7.2005 at midnight the personnel of Naval Intelligence and Naval Police along with other unidentified persons (IB/CBI) came to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2011

Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs. the Union of India and 2 Others.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 41(a), 74

desert his place of duty without prior permission, which is a serious offence under Section 41(a) of the Navy Act, 1957; when the appellant was caught by Mr. Pandey and questioned about his presence in the quarter, he ran … 1 This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of dismissal dated 14.09.2005 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.No.18454 of 2002 in which the appellant, being

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2010

3398223 M Sep Jagjit Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Apr-23-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … Acts. 2. The Learned Amicus Curiae has also assisted this Bench by furnishing synopsis specifying the scope of Section 14, 7, 15, 20 and 21 of the Act. As regards Section 15 pertaining to appeal it was emphasized

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … 777622 by the third respondent); as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India.4. The averments made in … taken me to the various provisions of Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989 (for short the Act). Section 64 of the Act contemplates that every person entrusting any goods to a railway administration for carriage shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … on his left cheek below left eye, he reported to medical officer at Naval Air Station, Kunjali at 1415 hrs on 06.11.2008. The medical officer diagnosed the ailment as Conjunctivitis and excused the petitioner for attending the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial