Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar

Union of India Rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. Ranj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

in Section 25(1) of the PC Act. Only the Army Act, 1950; the Air Force Act, 1950; the Navy Act, 1957; the Border Security Force Act, 1968; the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 … case punishable under the PC Act. The GARC rejected the preliminary objections raised 3. by the Respondents under Section 139 of the 2006 Act by an order dated 09.01.2017. Aggrieved by the said rejection order, the Respondents filed

Anubhav Family Trust Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1990)34ITD303(Mum.)

Dastur referred to the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Anny & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959. In that case the assessee-company had obtained a particular benefit and escaped … section specifically provided that no loss which has not been determined in pursuance of a return filed Under Section 139 shall be carried forward and set off under Sub-section (1) of Section 72 or Sub-section (2) of Section … against the order of the CIT Under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act relating to the assessment year 1984-85.2. The relevant facts may briefly be

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … ] See Conrad v. United States, 32 Ct.Cl. 139; Carrington v. United States, 46 Ct.Cl. 279. See … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Massimilano Latorre, Holder of Italian Passport Number Aa 1465972, (Ch ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

against some officers in the above ship. Alerted by the third respondent, the Coast Guard and the Indian Navy made a thorough search and detected that the firing was from a ship by name MT ENRICA LEXIE … contended that the said petitioners are the Chief Master Sergeant and Sergeant in the Italian Military Navy in active duty and that they were deployed in the ship as trained Navy personnel to protect and safeguard Italian … the decision in Mobarik Ali Ahmed Vs. The State of Bombay (AIR 1957 SC 857), where it was held that the exercise of criminal jurisdiction … limit of territorial waters (Manchester v. Massachussetts, (1891) 139 U.S. 240). The exercise of jurisdiction by the … 2012, copy of which is marked as Ext.P2 for murder punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC).

Ram Gopal Neotia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)1ITD160(Kol.)

the assessee were not competent, the departmental representative has relied on the following decisions: CIT v. Army & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959 (Bom.), Jivatlal Purtupshi v. CIT [1967] 65 ITR 261 at page 267 … of returns in response to notices under Section 139(2)/148 or under the corresponding section of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessees have explained that they could not file the returns or delay occurred in the filing

J.P.Gupta and ors. Vs. Eveready Industries India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

to them in clauses (a) and (b) of section 3 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (67 of 1957 ).(2) Where any undertaking set- up for the construction of buildings, bridges, roads, canals, dams … Development Corporation Employees’ Union versus State of H.P.and others [(1996) 7 SCC 139]., again the law laid down was with respect to unamended provisions and … challenged before the Labour Court in fact was challenged before this Court in M.P.No.2109/1985 (Union Carbide Karmchari Sangh Navi Bagh versus Union of India and otheRs.and the Division Bench of this Court has dismissed the said writ

United States Vs. Testan

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

37 U.S.C. § 202(1) to the effect that an officer "serving as Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy is entitled to the basic pay of a rear admiral (lower half) or brigadier general, as appropriate. Page … 73 U. S. 575 (1868). See Lee v. Thornton, 420 U. S. 139 (1975); Richardson v. Morris, 409 U. S. 464 (1973); United States v. … another agency, and that, under the principle of "equal pay for substantially equal work" prescribed in the Classification Act, they were entitled to the higher classification. But their agency, and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) on appeal, … pay lost through allegedly improper classifications. To be sure, in the "purpose" section of the Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5101(1)(A), Congress stated that it was