Advanced Search Results

Karnataka Bank Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sunita B. Vatsaraj

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR891; (2007)109BOMLR1210; [2007(115)FLR217]

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed mainly in the police service or as an officer or … and was also supervising the work of the subordinates and was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act and therefore the reference was not maintainable. The tribunal also considered the respondents case

Garcetti Vs. Ceballos

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

see Willis v. Department of Agriculture, 141 F. 3d 1139, 1143 (CA Fed. 1998); Horton v. Department of Navy, 66 F. 3d 279, 282 (CA Fed. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U. S. 1176 (1996), or for statements … 391 U. S. 563 , and Connick v. Myers, 461 U. S. 138 . Held: When public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, … See Pickering, supra, at 568. If the answer is no, the employee has no First Amendment cause of action based on the employer’s reaction to the speech. See Connick , supra , at 147. If the answer

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … to alter a misinterpretation of its intent. Id. at 340 U. S. 138 . [ Footnote 6 ] Although all of the cases decided by … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

murdered Parkman, or later, when evil-disposed persons violated her laws in Lowell? Did they require the Army and Navy and martial law? And, sir, because a midnight murderer is sometimes found in the South, it should not … found in that report. Section 131(c) of the Act of September 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 634, 637, amended 42 U.S.C. § 1971 by adding a … was an offense under state law. Id., (dissenting opinion) 325 U. S. 138 -149, 325 U. S. 157 -161. It was said there, as it … APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Under R.S. § 1979, derived from § 1 of the "Ku Klux Act" of April 20, 1871, petitioners (six Negro children and their parents) brought an action in a Federal District