Advanced Search Results

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … reliance has also been placed on the pronouncement of the Supreme Court reported at JT 2000 (5) SC 135 Union of India v. Charanjit Singh Gil.65. Given the extent of the involvement of Commander B.K. Ahluwalia with

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that, … full - Mechanical WG VII/CPVI Assistant time Diploma - Electronics Rs.4620- in 135-5970- Engineering+1 140- year 8350+admis apprenticeship sible training allowances 2 Technician ITI +

M/s. Val Colour Arts, Mumbai and Another Vs. Sandesh Ramesh Bhosle

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or; (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … In any case, the employee being 'site supervisor' did not answer the definition of 'workman' in terms of Section 3(5) of the said Act read with Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. On these grounds,

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

the design of a rocket launcher, both of which were produced by ERCO and long used by the Navy. During the post-World War II period, petitioner was given security clearances on three occasions. [ Footnote 1 ] … manufactured materials for national defense. Report of the Commission on Government Security, 1957, S.Doc.No.64, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 236. During World War II, the War … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers … Army, Jan. 1, 1954, to June 30, 1954, 135-136. Thus, we see that the program has for

Jaswant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Govt,, as those orders are not under the Army Act or the Air Force Act, or the Navy Act, and therefore also, in his submission, the objection of limitation was clearly misplaced. When the matter was taken … disability pension with 15 years or more qualifying service, specific tables (total 135) indicating revised pension payable with effect from 1.7.2009, have been prepared for … raised objection about the petition being barred by time, and strong reliance was placed on the provision of Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, to contend, that the limitation prescribed is six months, and even

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … S. 393 U.S. 348 (1969); Kauffman v. Secretary of the Air Force, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 5, 415 F.2d 991, 995 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Anant Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 11(11), 24(2), 32, 32(1), 32(2) and 41(2)(5)

Reported in : (1993)109CTR(Guj)231; [1994]206ITR582(Guj)

against the business loss and, therefore, relying upon the decision in the case of CIT v. Army and Navy Stores Ltd. : [1957]31ITR959(Bom) , the Tribunal held that the assessee cannot urge that the business was discontinued … CIT v. West Coast Chemicals and Industries Ltd. 1 [962] 46 ITR 135. In the said decision, the assessee-company entered into an agreement for sale … Income-tax Tribunal was referred the following question of law for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : Common questions for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 : '(1) Whether the Tribunal was right

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

H. Rama Murthy Vs. K.R.D. Technologies Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A(2) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT658

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an Officer or other employee … the Labour Court-I, Hyderabad.2. The petitioner filed Miscellaneous Petition No. 10 of 2002 before the Labour Court, under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act'), claiming certain monetary and financial benefits. They

State of West Bengal Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 31, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 249, 254, 294 and 298; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2 and 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1963SC1241; [1964]1SCR371

exercise the acquisition of lands in all the States. These are needed for forts, armories and arsenals, for navy yards and light houses, for custom-houses, post offices and Court-houses, and for other public uses. If the right … exercise of authority conferred by Sections 6, 7 and 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. The Act was enacted for establishing in the economic interest of India greater public control over the coal … held in The Cherokee Nation v. The Southern Kansas Railway Co. (1889) 135 U.S. 641 : 34 L. ed. 295, that Congress has the power … referred to as the Act - enacted by the Parliament, and particularly Sections 4 and 7 thereof, were ultra vires the legislative competence of Parliament,