Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 132 · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2010

Mange Ram Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-14-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii)who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of … relies upon the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 132 at pg. 504 of the judgment in Bangalore Water Supply's case (supra). … the reference has been answered against him holding therein that he is not a 'workman' as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and also that the respondent-Radha

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2018

Chief Engineer, Pwd Nct Zone vs.rudal Rai

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-15-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … of a Division Bench of this court in PWD v. Satya Pal, 132 (2006) DLT571 He asserted that there was no contractor between the petitioner … from 4th July, 1999, without notice or W.P.(C). 6585/2015 Page 1 of 25 notice pay, in contravention of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the “ID Act”). He also contended that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

Ex. Nb. Sub. Mahesh Anand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rule - Rule 13(1); Navy Act - Sections 17(4)

Reported in : 2003(66)DRJ94; 2003(1)SLJ105(Delhi)

the requisite Discharge Certificate by the Navy which it was obliged to do under Section 7(4) of the Navy Act and he had, thereforee, no occasion to indicate the service rendered by him in the Navy at the … be granted pensionary benefits as he had not completed the requisite qualifying service of 15 years under para 132 of Army Pension Regulations of 1961. He was enrolled in the Army on 25.6.1957 and discharged on 13.10.1971

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 25 1975

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-25-1975

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … the constitutional issue that is tendered." 340 U.S. at 340 U. S. 132 -133. Petitioners agree with Gusik insofar as it holds that habeas corpus … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2023

Rangorath Gokul Prasad vs the Malabar Devaswom Board

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-06-2023

is the guardian of the Deity and apart from the jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Land Reforms Act, 1957 viz. the powers of revision, the High Court is having inherent jurisdiction and the doctrine of parents patriae … KANNIYAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 32 MANI @ SUSHEELA NAIR, D/O. AMMINI AMMA, NEW HEAVEN CH SECTOR, NO.14, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI. 33 KUTTAN @ NARAYANANKUTTY, S/O AMMINI AMMA, 004, SARVODAYA KUNJU CO- OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, BALAJI NAGAR, … Hon'ble Court in Travancore Devaswom Board Vs. Mohanan Nair [(2013) (3) KLT 132]which stands confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. iv. Issue a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … therefore unnecessary, see Gusik v. Schilder, 340 U.S. at 340 U. S. 132 -133. This is now the case here, for, during the pendency of … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2012

Massimilano Latorre, Holder of Italian Passport Number Aa 1465972, (Ch ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

against some officers in the above ship. Alerted by the third respondent, the Coast Guard and the Indian Navy made a thorough search and detected that the firing was from a ship by name MT ENRICA LEXIE … contended that the said petitioners are the Chief Master Sergeant and Sergeant in the Italian Military Navy in active duty and that they were deployed in the ship as trained Navy personnel to protect and safeguard Italian … the decision in Mobarik Ali Ahmed Vs. The State of Bombay (AIR 1957 SC 857), where it was held that the exercise of criminal jurisdiction … Uttar Pradesh and others (2012 (3) SCC case 132), quoting para 24 to 28 and 32 in … 2012, copy of which is marked as Ext.P2 for murder punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2002

Dhanji R. Zalte Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Sep-13-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD451(Pune.)

of the representation. Following observations of the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Army and Navy Stores Ltd. (1957) 31 ITR 959 (Bom) will be relevant to be reproduce: "It is difficult to understand … of penalty under the provisions of section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty levied for different assessment years is as follows: The … the purposes of deciding the present appeals also."... We have perused the statement of the assessee recorded under section 132(4) placed in the compilation at pages 42 to 45. In question No. 3 on page 42, a question

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

statements, to the officers working in border states as also officers working in the coast guard or the navy as they may be involved in anti smuggling operations - Plain reading of 208 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Digital … Excise, Directorate of Inspection and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. It was in 1957 that the intelligence work till then performed by the Central Revenue Intelligence … 2011 (the “Validation Act”) with effect from 16.09.2011. 132. A Division Bench of the High Court held … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1960

M. Shaikh Dawood Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-1960

Subject : Customs

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8)

Reported in : AIR1961Mad1; 1961CriLJ96; (1960)IIMLJ230

the same offence. Another statute which can be called up, from memory and without research is the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934. Section 4 of that Act provides that for the offences specified therein the offender may … the events that have happened since after the passing of the order of this court, dated October 31, 1957 it has now become necessary to determine."The Court finally held that the proceedings before the Sea Customs authorities … In Flower v. Ebbw Vale Steel Iron and Coal Co., 1934-2 KB 132, the following passage appears at page 154:"It is of course perfectly familiar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial