Advanced Search Results

C.H. Ramakrishna Vs. State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 475 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 420, 468, 471, 472 and 475; ;Central Civil Service (Control Classification and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT406(HC),2008(1)CHN483

civilian employees, serving in the Indian Navy in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, would be subject to the Navy Act, 1957. However, the provisions of the Indian Navy Act, 1957, had limited application to the civilian employees serving in … Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is a criminal revisional application under Sections 397 and 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge

Kanwardeepsingh Harbansingh Bedi Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3), 3(13), 34 to 76, 77(1), 78, 78(1) and 93(1); Evidence Act - Sections 145; Army Act - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Naval Discipline Act; Indian Navi (Discipline) Act, 1934; Air Force Act; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 192, 193, 197(2), 209, 227, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 374(2), 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549 and 549(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 304A and 381; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3 to 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 2010CriLJ315

materially different from the scheme of Sections 125 and 126 of the Army Act.11. Section 3(3) of the Navy Act, 1957, defines the term 'Civil offence' and it means an offence triable by a court of ordinary criminal jurisdiction … proceedings should be instituted.9. In the case of Loraiya (Supra), the trial before the Special Judge under Section 120-B of IPC read with Section 5(1) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was quashed by the

Harpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to … was slapped two-three times by the Harpreet. He also took out Rs. 120/- from her purse. Before leaving, Satyender had threatened her that she would … order of sentence dated 22nd August, 2009. The appellants Harpreet Singh and Satyender Singh have been convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) and all the appellants-accused have been convicted under

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar … Act. |guilty of | | |Navy Act. |Sentenced to undergo|alternate charge | | |3. Under Section |RI for 120 months |under Section 51 | | |60(a) Navy Act. |dismissal from |of the Navy Act | | |4.

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … law." Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117 , 342 U. S. 120 (1951). This maxim of equitable jurisdiction originated as a corollary to the … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69, 70, 122(1), 125 and 125(2); ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 192, 213, 243, 244, 245, 247, 248, 254, 484(2), 549 and 549(1); ;Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 5(1) and 5(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 354, 452, 467, 471 and 506; ;Criminal Courts and Court-martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 475 and 475(1)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ531

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to the … order dated 4-9-2000 whereby a charge has been ordered to be framed against the petitioner and others under Sections 452, 354 and 506, I.P.C. and has been framed on the same day.2. The grievance of the petitioner … Lt. Col. S.K. Loraiya was charged by Special Judge, Gauhati, under Section 120-B, I.P.C. read with Section 5(1)(c) and (d) and Section 5(2) of the

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … tried by a court-martial and convicted of rape, in violation of Art. 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. The … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Union of India Vs. R.C. Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 184; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 79

Reported in : 25(1984)DLT245; 1984LabIC1935

of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 184 of The Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as also Section 13 of the Act requiring oath of allegiance to … defined in Sec, 3(20) of the Act belonging to the Naval Organisation. Then again on pages 115 to 120 of these Instructions these various categories of Seaman Branch Sailors occur together with their qualifications for advancement force

United States Vs. Oregon

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

in this natural manner. Congress undoubtedly has the power -- under its constitutional powers to raise armies and navies and to conduct wars -- to pay pensions, and to build hospitals and homes for veterans. We think … violate the Tenth Amendment. The controlling provision was passed in 1941 as an amendment to the Sundry Appropriations Act of 1910. [ Footnote 6 ] The 1910 Act quite plainly and unequivocally provided that the admission of … and the central provision of the Act, quoted above, was significantly changed. Section 1 of the new Act restates this provision without reference to the … not inconsistent with this opinion. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] Ore.Rev.Stat. § 120.010 provides: "Immediately upon the death of any person who dies intestate without