Advanced Search Results

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … prevent the production of inadmissible evidence whether it is or is not objected to by the parties. Under Section 115 it is the duty of the court to decide which view of the facts is true and then

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

him by an unreasoned and non-speaking verdict dated 29.04.2009 passed by the Trial Court Martial in violation of Section 115 of the Navy Act, 1957. By the said impugned verdict, the petitioner was punished with a sentence of … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1)

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

fact the President and Members of the Court Martial have been constituted to be the sole judges under Section 115 of the Navy Act. I, thereforee, do not intend to go into the facts of the case except … There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … 850Rs. 3.50Rs. 851 to 950Rs. 3.55Rs. 951 to 1050Rs. 3.60Rs. 1051 to 1150Rs. 3.65Rs. 1151 to 1250Rs. 3.70Rs. 1251 to 1350Rs. 3.75Rs. 1351 to 1450Rs.

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shivendra Bikaram Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 452 and 497; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 97, 101, 102, 162 and 163; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act - Sections 130; Military Laws

Reported in : AIR2003SC2481; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)147; 2003CriLJ3028; JT2003(4)SC235; 2003(4)SCALE284; (2003)6SCC359; [2003]3SCR881; 2003(2)LC1066(SC)

the offences under sections 497, 452 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2)of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referredto as 'the Act') and the order of the Chiefof the Naval Staff dated 8th January, 2001passed … prevent the production of inadmissible evidence whether it is or is not objected to by the parties. Under Section 115 it is the duty of the court to decide which view of the facts is true and then

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … States." C. 37, § 14, 3 Stat. 113, 115. The provision next appeared as R.S. § 1288. … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Union of India Vs. R.C. Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 184; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 79

Reported in : 25(1984)DLT245; 1984LabIC1935

of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 184 of The Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as also Section 13 of the Act requiring oath of allegiance to … 'Seaman' as defined in Sec, 3(20) of the Act belonging to the Naval Organisation. Then again on pages 115 to 120 of these Instructions these various categories of Seaman Branch Sailors occur together with their qualifications for

Anant Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 11(11), 24(2), 32, 32(1), 32(2) and 41(2)(5)

Reported in : (1993)109CTR(Guj)231; [1994]206ITR582(Guj)

against the business loss and, therefore, relying upon the decision in the case of CIT v. Army and Navy Stores Ltd. : [1957]31ITR959(Bom) , the Tribunal held that the assessee cannot urge that the business was discontinued … Income-tax Tribunal was referred the following question of law for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : Common questions for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 : '(1) Whether the Tribunal was right … India referred to Halsbury's Laws of England, Third edition, volume 20, pages 115-117. In paragraph 211 of the Halsbury's Laws of England, it is stated

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

statements, to the officers working in border states as also officers working in the coast guard or the navy as they may be involved in anti smuggling operations - Plain reading of 208 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Digital … Excise, Directorate of Inspection and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. It was in 1957 that the intelligence work till then performed by the Central Revenue Intelligence … of work among the officers of customs. [Para 115] Customs Act, 1962 - s.6 - Entrustment of … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements,

M. Shaikh Dawood Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8)

Reported in : AIR1961Mad1; 1961CriLJ96; (1960)IIMLJ230

the same offence. Another statute which can be called up, from memory and without research is the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934. Section 4 of that Act provides that for the offences specified therein the offender may … the events that have happened since after the passing of the order of this court, dated October 31, 1957 it has now become necessary to determine."The Court finally held that the proceedings before the Sea Customs authorities … again in Venkatanarayana Iyer v. Collector of Central Excise, Madras,1958-2 Mad LJ 115 : (AIR 1938 Mad 306), where the same view was taken. So