Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 112 · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 2015

Satnarain Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2015

Subject : Education

decision reported as AIR1999SC1980UOI & ORS. Vs. Himmat Singh Chahar, pertaining to a Court Martial proceedings under the Navy Act, 1957, the Supreme Court categorically rejected the concept of the high level of proof required at a criminal trial … Force Court. Chargesheet was drawn and petitioner was charged as under :“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 IS TO SAY CRIMINAL, MISCONDUCT FOR HAVING BEEN AS PUBLIC SERVANT IN POSSESSION OF PECUNIARY RESOURCES DISPROPORTIONATE TO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … from the deposition of PW 12 Shri D.K. Das is relevant in this regard:“Q. 1028 For this draft 112759 how much money was in cash and how much was in the form of cheque or cheques?. A.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2008

Munaf Vs. Geren

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-12-2008

Subject : MRTP

been reluctant to intrude upon the authority of the Executive in military and national security affairs.” Department of Navy v. Egan , 484 U. S. 518 , 530 (1988). In Omar , the District Court granted and … Japanese Government.” Girard v. Wilson , 152 F. Supp. 21, 27 (DC 1957). In the District Court’s view, to permit the transfer to Japanese authority … Resolutions. Pursuant to the U. N. mandate, MNF-I forces detain individuals alleged to have committed hostile or warlike acts in Iraq, pending investigation and prosecution in Iraqi courts under Iraqi law. Shawqi Omar and Mohammad Munaf (hereinafter … (2001) (“We begin, as always, with the language of the statute”). That section applies to persons held “in custody under or by color of the … supra, at 529-530; Neely , supra , at 112-113, 122. Omar and Munaf concede that Iraq has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … , 303 U. S. 229 (1938); Fortier v. New Orleans National Bank, 112 U. S. 439 , 112 U. S. 444 (1884). Those principles are … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1960

Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-1960

Subject : Land Acquisition

(1957), was binding as to all classes of persons included within the section and that each class was nonseverable. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927. … entirely inapposite. Page 361 U. S. 285 Those cases permitted trial by courts-martial of paymasters' clerks in the navy. The Court found that such a position was "an important one in the machinery of the navy," the … ] See Army Regulations 600-201, 20 June 1956, as changed 15 March 1957, and Army Regulations 624-200, 19 May 1958, as changed 1 July 1959. … Army and stationed in Berlin, was convicted by a general court-martial on a plea of guilty to three acts of sodomy. While serving his five-year sentence, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1963

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-18-1963

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sixth Amendments are "preserved to every one accused of crime who is not attached to the army, or navy, or militia in actual service." Id. at 71 U. S. 123 . [ Footnote 19 ] "[I]f society … first and most important of these was Huber v. Reily, 53 Pa. 112 (1866), in which, as in most of the cases which followed, [ … relief in Federal District Courts, which rendered judgments declaring that the relevant statutes, § 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, are unconstitutional. Mendoza-Martinez' … from denying his citizenship subsequently. Pp. 372 U. S. 155 -158. 3. Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1975

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-25-1975

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … 33 ] See United States ex rel. Guagliardo v. McElroy, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 114, 259 F.2d 927, 929 (1958), aff'd, 361 U. S. 281 (1960). … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2012

Jaswant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Decided on : Aug-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Govt,, as those orders are not under the Army Act or the Air Force Act, or the Navy Act, and therefore also, in his submission, the objection of limitation was clearly misplaced. When the matter was taken … raised objection about the petition being barred by time, and strong reliance was placed on the provision of Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, to contend, that the limitation prescribed is six months, and even

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

statements, to the officers working in border states as also officers working in the coast guard or the navy as they may be involved in anti smuggling operations - Plain reading of 208 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Digital … Excise, Directorate of Inspection and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. It was in 1957 that the intelligence work till then performed by the Central Revenue Intelligence … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements, … of limitation, and why the penalties under Sections 112(a) and (b)(i) and (ii) of the Act, 1962,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1987

United States Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-18-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

431 U. S. 671 -672 (1977) (citations omitted). [ Footnote 3 ] In Uptegrove, the wife of a Navy lieutenant killed while flying home on an Air Force C-141 transport brought suit against the Government under the … United States v. Brown, 348 U. S. 110 , 348 U. S. 112 (1954); United States v. Muniz, 374 U. S. 150 , 374 U. … Syllabus Under Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135 , the Government has no Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) liability for injuries to members of the military service arising out of or in the course of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial