Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 111 · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 1992

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-02-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … upon the accused by Trial Judge Advocate.4. At that stage, the accused-sailor filed a Contempt Case, C.C.C. No. 111 of 1992, before this Court contending that the naval authorities have not concluded the trial under the naval

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … terms of Section 155(2) of the Act. The court martial failed to comply with the provisions of Section 111(8) of the Act which would go to the very root of the trial. It is also contended that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2008

The Executive Engineer, No. 1, Hemavathi Right Bank, Nala Division, Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-29-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 25B and 25F; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6N; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Industrial Employment Standing Order, 1946; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 226, 309 to 311 and 372

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ513Kant

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … peace. He relied on a decision reported in AIR 1949 Federal Court 111 and submitted that the Industrial Tribunal's rights are not fettered by any … that decides the issue as to whether it is industry or not within the meaning of definition of Section 2(j) of the Act Under Section 2(k) of the Act the 'industrial dispute' is defined and all disputes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 1998

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer or other employee of a … supervisor in the mechanical maintenance department had filed a Complaint (ULP) No. 111 of 1980 whereas the first respondent Shri Ramesh Kumbla who was working … the preliminary issue that the complaint was maintainable since respondent No. 1 was a 'workman', as defined in section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'I.D. Act') or an employee as defined in clause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2015

Satnarain Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2015

Subject : Education

decision reported as AIR1999SC1980UOI & ORS. Vs. Himmat Singh Chahar, pertaining to a Court Martial proceedings under the Navy Act, 1957, the Supreme Court categorically rejected the concept of the high level of proof required at a criminal trial … S/o Shri Dadi Ram r/o B-303 B, Kirari S M P Nagar 111, New Delhi-41 in his bank A/C No.30026832947 at SBI Mundka, (Code No.6814) … Force Court. Chargesheet was drawn and petitioner was charged as under :“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 IS TO SAY CRIMINAL, MISCONDUCT FOR HAVING BEEN AS PUBLIC SERVANT IN POSSESSION OF PECUNIARY RESOURCES DISPROPORTIONATE TO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

Ex. Nb. Sub. Mahesh Anand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rule - Rule 13(1); Navy Act - Sections 17(4)

Reported in : 2003(66)DRJ94; 2003(1)SLJ105(Delhi)

the requisite Discharge Certificate by the Navy which it was obliged to do under Section 7(4) of the Navy Act and he had, thereforee, no occasion to indicate the service rendered by him in the Navy at the … under Army Rule 13(1)(i)(b) and sent to Zambia on the same date after having completed 14 years and 111 days service. His grievance is that he thereafter asked for his pensionary benefits and made several representations to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1976

Sarabhai Chemicals Ltd., Baroda Vs. Ambaram Amtharam Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-01-1976

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2 and 4; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Madras Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : [1977(35)FLR15]; (1977)0GLR455; (1978)ILLJ105Guj

State Government, or who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957. Explanation : In the case of an employee, who, having been employed for a period of not less … (T). v. Standard Vacuum Oil Co. Madras and others, A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 111, the Supreme Court has referred to some of the tests which can … worked as chemist from the year 1959 to 1973. On 1st January, 1974 he was appointed as the section head of the Quality Control department. His pay upto 31st March, 1974 was Rs. 960 per month but

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … also Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U. S. 103 , 339 U. S. 111 (1950); and n. 7, supra. [ Footnote 3/15 ] For this reason, … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1963

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-18-1963

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sixth Amendments are "preserved to every one accused of crime who is not attached to the army, or navy, or militia in actual service." Id. at 71 U. S. 123 . [ Footnote 19 ] "[I]f society … law forfeits citizenship. That is the monstrosity of the law." 43 Cong.Rec. 111 (1908). The entire discussion, id. at 110-114, was based on the premise … relief in Federal District Courts, which rendered judgments declaring that the relevant statutes, § 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, are unconstitutional. Mendoza-Martinez' … from denying his citizenship subsequently. Pp. 372 U. S. 155 -158. 3. Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial