Advanced Search Results

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … examined and recorded the depositions of the officer of the Court without administering him oath in violation of Section 110 of the Navy Act.(ii) The summary of evidence of PW1, 2, 12 and 14 was not provided to

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised … service) available. Such opinion shall be recorded in the convening order.(3) In 110 case shall an officer below the rank of captain be a member

Lt. Col. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 80, 163(1) and 165

Reported in : 82(1999)DLT183

under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read in conjunction with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did at about 1900 hours on the Eleventh day of October, 1996, was guilty of conduct unbecoming … Lieutenant now Lieutenant Commander Upender Pratap Singh Bhadoria (03102-2), the Senior Evaluator of answer sheets of Artificer Apprentice 110 Batch and Metric Entry Recruitment 02/97 batch, that let us make some money in recruitment, people have made

Srirupa Roy Vs. Lalit Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the complainant a monthly maintenance of Rs.59,170.92/- as is admissible under the provisions of Section 31 of the Navy Act, 1957, vide order dated 10.04.2023 issued by the Commander, CDR (P & A). The same reads as under:- “MAINTENANCE … (PS) - DISC AND VIG INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (NAVY) DIRECTORATE OF PERSONNEL SERVICES NEW DELHI - 110 011 2. SURINDER HORA COLONEL, GROUP COMMANDER NCC GROUP HEADQUARTERS PLOT NO115 2ND FLOOR OPP BHEL ENCLAVE, AKBAR

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, BLOCK NO.14, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 003.2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

(1) Lpa No.401 of 2010 (Oandm) Vs. Presiding Officer Labour Court-ii F ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950).or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950).or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … entertain the dispute referred by the appropriate Government was that these appellants are No.“workman”. within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”.).Evidence was led by both the

Arun Ramchandra Hublikar Vs. Cummins Diesel Sales and Service (I) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … Labour Court heard the parties on preliminary issue and held that the Petitioner was not a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and answered the Reference accordingly. This order has been challenged by

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn our attention to the pronouncement reported at AIR 2009 SC 1100, Rajiv Arora v. Union of India wherein the court held as follows:“14. The High Court in its impugned

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 12

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi515

for the named public purpose, that is, the planned development of Delhi. It is contended that Delhi Development Act 1957 (the Act) and the Master Plan (the plan) framed there under have no application to the cantonment areas … it can request the Central Government to acquire the same. This has to be done in accordance with Section 110. Central Government cannot ignore the provisions of the Cantonment Act and acquire land for the purpose of the … functions, because private property is needed from time to time for fortifications, navy-yards, post offices, customs houses, school houses, parks, highways and so on. But