Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Lt. Rajender Singh Punia Vs. Chief of Naval Staff and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceFamily

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 79 - Order 1, Rules 9 and 10; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14 and 14(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300; Navy Regulations - Regulation 216, 216(2), 216(3) and 216(5); Army Act

Reported in : 2007(5)ALD349; 2007(4)ALT421

28-7-1995 vide which he was discharged from naval service with effect from 10-8-1995 under Section 15(2)(a) of the Navy Act, 1957 (for short, 'the Act') read with Regulation 216 of the Regulations Navy, Part II (statutory) (hereinafter referred to

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

the Army Act would equally govern the person sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment by the court-martial under the Navy Act, 1957 (for short “the 1957 Act”) and the Air Force Act. The two-Judge Bench referred to the divergence of … manner, inquire regarding the absence of the person. The rest of the provision need not be adverted to.8. Section 109 deals with different kinds of court-martial and clause (b) of the said Section relates to district court-martial. Section

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Army Act would equally govern the person sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment by the court- martial under the Navy Act, 1957 (for short “the 1957 Act”) and the Air Force Act. The two-Judge Bench referred to the divergence of … manner, inquire regarding the absence of the person. The rest of the provision need not be adverted to.8. Section 109 deals with different kinds of court-martial and clause (b) of the said Section relates to district court-martial. Section

Cdr Seema Chaudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

issued by the Union Government on 9 October 1991 and 6 November 1998 under Section 9(2) of the Navy Act. Moreover, this Court held that the policy decision of the Union Government dated 25 February 1999 would govern … envisaged in the Notifications issued by the Union Government on 9-10-1991 and 6-11-1998 under Section 9(2) of the 1957 Act. 109.2. By and as a result of the policy decision of the Union Government in the Ministry

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … , 206 U. S. 348 (1907); Johnson v. Sayre, 158 U. S. 109 , 158 U. S. 114 (1895); Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Solorio Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

provides little support for O'Callahan. For example, in 1800, Congress enacted Articles for the Better Government of the Navy, which provided that "[a]ll offences committed by persons belonging to the navy while on the shore shall be … , 206 U. S. 348 (1907); Johnson v. Sayre, 158 U. S. 109 , 158 U. S. 114 (1895); Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. … our earlier decision in O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U. S. 258 (1969). While petitioner Richard Solorio was on active duty in the Seventeenth Coast Guard District in Juneau, Alaska, he sexually abused two young daughters of fellow … Armed Forces, Art. I, § 8, cl. 14, appears in the same section as do the provisions granting Congress authority, inter alia, to regulate commerce

Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

entirely inapposite. Page 361 U. S. 285 Those cases permitted trial by courts-martial of paymasters' clerks in the navy. The Court found that such a position was "an important one in the machinery of the navy," the … ] See Army Regulations 600-201, 20 June 1956, as changed 15 March 1957, and Army Regulations 624-200, 19 May 1958, as changed 1 July 1959. … (1957), was binding as to all classes of persons included within the section and that each class was nonseverable. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927. … well as Johnson v. Sayre, 158 U. S. 109 (1895), however, shows them to be entirely inapposite. … Army and stationed in Berlin, was convicted by a general court-martial on a plea of guilty to three acts of sodomy. While serving his five-year sentence, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

warrants intruding on the integrity of military court processes. Reversed. [ Footnote 1 ] See Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U. S. 676 (1974). [ Footnote 2 ] Pet. for Cert., App. E, pp. 23-25. … Services of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., 109, 110 (1973). See also Hearings on Military Drug Abuse, 1971, before the … Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which provides that court-martial proceedings "are final and conclusive" and that "all action taken pursuant to those proceedings [is] binding upon all . . . courts . . . of the … to action upon a petition for a new trial as provided in section 873 of this title (article 73) and to action by the Secretary