Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 105 · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 2008

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … an oath or affirmation in the form and manner prescribed by Section 104 of the Act. Thereafter under Section 105 when the court is ready to commence the trial, the trial judge advocate is required to read out

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1999

Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-26-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2393

when commit any offence are dealt with the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … inflicted injuries on the body of Lance Pratap Singh and the case of the petitioner was covered under Section 105 of the Evidence Act and Section 97 of the Ranbir Penal Code equivalent to Section 97 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shivendra Bikaram Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 452 and 497; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 97, 101, 102, 162 and 163; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act - Sections 130; Military Laws

Reported in : AIR2003SC2481; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)147; 2003CriLJ3028; JT2003(4)SC235; 2003(4)SCALE284; (2003)6SCC359; [2003]3SCR881; 2003(2)LC1066(SC)

the offences under sections 497, 452 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2)of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referredto as 'the Act') and the order of the Chiefof the Naval Staff dated 8th January, 2001passed … by Section 104 of the Act and the plea of the accused on the charges is recorded under Section 105. That stage was never reached in this case because the objections were not disposed of in accordance with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … Salt Marketing Centre, Gatiahati v. Union of India and others, AIR 1996 Gauhati 36,wherein the case arose under Section 105 of the Railways Act, when the goods were weighed enroute by railway without information to the consignor or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2023

Union Of India Vs. Air Commodore Nk Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2023

Subject : Education

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … Courts under Article 226 with that of the Supreme Court above them remains to its fullest extent despite Section 105.” This position stood restated, recently, in Union of India v Parashotam Dass17 “26. On the legislature introducing the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2011

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

1999 (3) SC 631 UOI & Ors. vs. Himmat Singh Chahar, pertaining to a Court-Martial proceedings under the Navy Act 1957 the Supreme Court categorically rejected the concept of the high- level of proof required at a criminal trial … shall be given an opportunity to address the court and BSF Rule 105 should be complied with.8. The proceedings after revision shall be forwarded to … against the petitioner which is sought to be projected as conduct of a guilty mind and hence incriminating.4. Section 41(e) of the BSF Act 1968 reads as under:- "41. Any person subject to this Act who commits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Harphool Kumawat Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-2015

Subject : Education

decision reported as AIR1999SC1980UOI & ORS. Vs. Himmat Singh Chahar, pertaining to a Court Martial proceedings under the Navy Act, 1957, the Hon'ble Supreme Court categorically rejected the concept of the high level of proof required at a criminal … out of them PW-1, HC Istakhar and PW-2, ASI C.V.Sabu were from 105 Battalion BSF whereas PW-3 to PW-5 were Managers of SBI, namely, Mr.Paresh … Court for which charge-sheet was drawn. The petitioner was charged as under:“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 IS TO SAY CRIMINAL, MISCONDUCT FOR HAVING BEEN AS PUBLIC SERVANT IN POSSESSION OF PECUNIARY RESOURCES DISPROPORTIONATE TO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1984

Ved Prakash Gupta Vs. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(i)(c)

Reported in : AIR1984SC914; [1984(48)FLR417]; (1984)ILLJ546SC; 1984(1)SCALE474; (1984)2SCC569; [1984]3SCR169; 1984(1)SLJ569(SC); 1984(16)LC523(SC)

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … material supplier) came to 1MI department with two copies of challan No. 105 dated 15.7.1979 for obtaining the signature of the person concerned in 'token … of the dismissal of the appellant to the Labour Court, Faridabad in Reference No. 143 of 1980 under Section 10(i)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act.' The Labour Court framed the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … confusion for mistake occurred in giving the confusion for mistake occurred in giving the fact in P 56.” 105. Questions on these aspects were put to this witness by the court as well, which may also be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2012

Larsen and Toubro Ltd and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

the cause of the disputes. See A.V.Fernandez v. State of Kerala (A.I.R 1957 SC 657); Ramo Swarup v. Foti (A.I.R 1933 All. 321); Firm of … or on specified occasions by the lessor to the lessee. The legal concept of lease is contemplated by section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act and that shows that there are three basic requirements to make any … Mumbai 400 021, is the New Towns Development Authority in the area designated for the New Town of Navi Mumbai by the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its power under sub-section (1) and (3A) of section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial