Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: national security act 1980 section 6 · Page 1 of about 4,260 results (0.177 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 30 1995

Smt. Satmabegum Mohammed Razak Khan Vs. Shri Satish Sahney and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-30-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 22(5) and 22(6)

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR166; (1995)97BOMLR745

to the maintenance of public order in future and that it is necessary to detain you under the National Security Act, 1980, to prevent you from acting in such a prejudicial manner in future.'.Based on the aforesaid subjective satisfaction arrived … No. 79/PCB/Zone-I/94 dated 1st November, 1994 passed by Shri Satish Sahaney, The Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay under section 3(2) of the National Security Act. The said order alongwith the grounds of detention were served on the … of Hujaria Mohalla, Nagpada, Bombay - 400 008. In his statement dated 6-8-1994 he has stated that he knows you and your associates viz., Nasir

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1981

C. Krishna Reddy and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-20-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 186 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 151

Reported in : 1982CriLJ592

Jail, and their detention is illegal, null and void. 3. The detenus were arrested and detained under the National Security Act, 1980. The arrest and detention of the detenus were not made by the 1st respondent during the subsistence of … learned counsel for the petitioner, raised several points in this writ petition. 6. The first point urged by him is that the grounds of detention … Meer Chowk) alleging that he and some others demonstrated before his office. The said case was registered under Section 3 of the Indian Police (Incitement of Disaffection) Act of 1922. The 1st detenu as the President of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1991

Manoj and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2053

detention have been made in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-sec. (2) of S. 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (Central Act 65 of 1980), with a view to preventing the detenus from acting in any manner prejudicial … (2) of S. 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (Central Act 65 of 1980), with a view to preventing the detenus from acting in … maintenance of supplies of commodies essential to the commodity as defined in the Explanation to sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, and accordingly, no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 18 1981

ismail Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers and Drug-offenders Ordinance - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 14(2) and 17; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 12(2), 13, 14 and 14(2)

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR20; 1982CriLJ582; 1982MhLJ359

authority i.e., the Commissioner of police Greater Bombay under a detention order issued under S. 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (Act 65 of 1980) hereinafter referred to as an Act practically on identical grounds. Against the said order … order issued under S. 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (Act 65 of 1980) hereinafter referred to as an Act practically on identical grounds. … the other hand it is contended by Shri Kotwal the learned Public Prosecutor, that the bar contemplated by Section 14(2) of the Ordinance is qua the order issued under the Ordinance itself, and it has no application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 1987

Talib Khan and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-09-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988CriLJ266; 1987(2)WLN209

separate detention orders, all passed by the District Magistrate, Jaisalmer, on Jan. 7,1987 under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (for short, hereinafter, 'the Act'), in the Central Jail, Jodhpur, as common questions of law and facts are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1984

Ajay Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-1984

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980; Constitution of India - Articles 22(3) and 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 286, 302, 307 and 342

Reported in : AIR1985SC18; 1985CriLJ487; 1984(2)Crimes766(SC); 1984(2)SCALE529; (1984)4SCC400; [1985]1SCR843

the Constitution challenges the detention of Ajay Dixit, his son in the District Jail of Agra, under the National Security Act, 1980. The District Magistrate, Agra passed a detention order and served on Ajay Dixit hereinafter called the detenu under … The District Magistrate, Agra passed a detention order and served on Ajay Dixit hereinafter called the detenu under Section 3 of The National Security Act, hereinafter called the Act, on six different grounds. The grounds mentioned therein … F.C.R. 49, Nakkuda Ali v. M. F. De S. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66 and King Emperor v. Vimalabal Deshpande, L.R. 73 1. A. 144, considered.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1990

Gazi Khan Alias Chotia Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-15-1990

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1990(1)WLN470

Advocate General, appearing for the respondents, submitted that the petitioner was earlier detained Under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 and he was released not on the merits but on the technical objection that the District Magistrate was … to detain such person Section 5 lays down the power to regulate place and conditions of detention and Section 6 relates to grounds of detention severable. Section 9 deals with the Advisory Boards. Section 10 lays down the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1999

Chandresh Paswan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 226; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(4), 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 13, 14 and 19; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 332, 427, 504 and 506; Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2759

deciding instant petition, challenging the order of preventive detention of the petitioner, passed under the provisions of the National Security Act, 1980 hereinafter called the 'Act,' on merits, the principal agenda of this Full Bench is to answer the following … detention. Section 5A protects the order of detention if one or some of the grounds are found invalid. Section 6 validates the orders of detention passed against persons residing outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Government or officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1982

Sajid Issac Vs. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-14-1982

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 22(5) and 22(6)

Reported in : AIR1982AP358

set at liberty. The writ petition is accordingly allowed.17. Petition allowed. Constitution - detention - Section 8 of National Security Act, 1980 and Articles 22 (5) and 22 (6) of Constitution of India - detention under National Security Act challenged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2001

inder Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-20-2001

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC502; 2002(2)WLN533

assailed his detention ordered on 13.7.2000 by the District Magistrate, under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (for short 'the Act') with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the … followed by this Court in Kuldeep Singh v. State (supra) and Rajulal v. State 2000 WLC (UC) Raj. 697 observed as under:6. this Court in the aforesaid two cases has clearly held that if in the detention

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial