Advanced Search Results

Sunil S/O Sadashiv Ghate Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2,3), 8, 9, 10 12, 13 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 8(1) and 14; COFEPOSA Act - Sections 3 and 11; PIT NDPS Act - Sections 3 and 12; Prevention Detention Act, 1950; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971; General Clauses Act, 1897

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR827; 2000BomCR(Cri)827; 2000CriLJ3709; 2000(4)MhLj386

Maharashtra and another 1998 (1) BCC 267, wherein the Court was seized with a detention matter under the National Security Act, 1980 and having considered the cases of Kamleshkumar and Veermani (cited supra), held that--- 'Even if we do not … Act, and while comparing the provisions of the COFEPOSA Act and PIT NDPS Act with those of the National Security Act, 1980 as well as earlier preventive detention laws, namely, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 and the Maintenance of Internal

Talib Khan and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988CriLJ266; 1987(2)WLN209

separate detention orders, all passed by the District Magistrate, Jaisalmer, on Jan. 7,1987 under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (for short, hereinafter, 'the Act'), in the Central Jail, Jodhpur, as common questions of law and facts are … Year's gift to the State by way of detention of 35 persons on one single day under the National Security Act, 1980. The satisfaction recorded was only to achieve praise from the State Govt. and despite the fact that satisfaction

Th. Ibochou Singh Vs. State of Manipur and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 8, 8(1), 9, 10, 13, 14 and 80

passed by the District Magistrate Imphal West on 23-1-2004 directing the detention of the said detenu under the National Security Act, 1980 and subsequent approval and confirmation of the said order by the State Government (Annexures A/1, A/2 and A/2-1).2. … his right to make a representation before the Central Government within the purview of Section 14 of the National Security Act, 1980.'14. The same view is found to have been taken in an earlier decision of this Court made in

Amritha Vs. Collector and District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1896 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 9, 12(1) and 13(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950- Sections 8; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 8 and 8(1); Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD(Cri)233; 2008(3)ALT563; 2008CriLJ3123

held that COFEPOSA Act and PIT NDPS Act differ from that of other preventive detention laws, namely, the National Security Act, 1980, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, and the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. While dealing with the National … 1980, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, and the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. While dealing with the National Security Act, 1980, the Supreme Court observed as under:.The effect of the approval by the State Government is that from the

Kamlakar Prasad Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19, 22(5) and 32; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 5-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 107, 117, 147, 149, 307, 323, 353, 448 and 501

Reported in : AIR1984SC211; 1983CriLJ1928; 1983(2)SCALE729; (1983)4SCC443; [1984]1SCR317

prevent the person so acting in a manner set out in Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. In order to avoid the charge that a stray incident seized upon to invoke such drastic power of … The second respondent passed the Order of detention dated 6.5.1983 against the petitioner Under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980. The grounds of detention were served on the petitioner in jail and copy thereof was served on the

Lakmi Mongsang Vs. State of Nagaland and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 12(1) and 12(2); Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Chief Secretary (Home), Government of Nagaland detaining him under Sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. The detenu was also served with the particulars in support of the grounds of detention on 08.11.2003 along … order confirming the detention in exercise of powers under Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 12 of the National Security Act, 1980. The order of detention dated 06.11.2003 may be reproduced hereunder, which reads :'GOVERNMENT OF NAGALANDHOME DEPARTMENT; POLITICAL BRANCHORDERNo.

Bhaskaranand Alias Babulley Vs. District Magistrate, Mirzapur and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22 and 22 (5); National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3(2) (5), 8(1), 11, 12 and 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 134, 300B, 302 and 307; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 11; Genera Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1627; 2000CriLJ3362

order dated 17.4.1999, passed by the District Magistrate, Mirzapur, in exercise of power under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act. 1980 (In short the 'Act') in order to prevent the detenu from acting in any manner prejudicial to the … under the provisions of the Maintenance of internal Security Act, 1971, a Statute in pan materia with the National Security Act, 1980. The question was answered in these words : 'Article 22. clause (5) provides, inter alia, that theauthority making

Yumman Ongbi Lembi Leima Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Section 3(2); Aforesaid Act - Section 3(4); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 13, 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 386, 34, 302; Constitution of India - Article 21, 22(2),

Reported in : (2012)2SCC176; AIR2012SC321

District, Manipur, the Appellant's husband, Yumman Somendro @ Somo @ Tiken, was detained under the provisions of the National Security Act, 1980. The said detention order was approved by the Governor of Manipur on 7th February, 2011, in exercise of … copy of the detention order dated 31st January, 2011, issued by the District Magistrate, Imphal West, under the National Security Act, 1980.3. On 31st January, 2011, the Appellant's husband was served with the grounds of detention under the National Security

Thanglenmang Hangsing Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2) and 3(3)

B. Biswas, J.1. The petitioner Mr. Thanglenmang Hangsing @ Jhonson @ Mamang was detained under the National Security Act, 1980 with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State … District Magistrate, Senapati District, Manipur. The order of detention issued under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 is in challenge in this petition.2. It would appear from the pleadings on record that the writ petitioner

Virender @ Kala and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)696; 81(1999)DLT635; 2000(52)DRJ444

dated 23rd April,1999 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980, with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. … is deterring people from coming forward to give evidence; it was felt necessary to detain him under the National Security Act, 1980 as there was every apprehension that very soon he will be released on bail in all the cases