Advanced Search Results

Rangasamy Vs. Periammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1991ACJ45

V. Ratnam, J.1. This appeal, under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, has been preferred by the owner of the vehicle against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal … on transfer of the vehicle is not one of the permissible defences under Section 96 (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act. Reliance in this connection was placed by learned counsel for the appellant upon the decision reported in Madineni

Rama Shanker Misra and Brothers Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Kanp ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(20), 59, 59(1), 59(2), 60(1) and 68(1); Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rules 63 and 64

Reported in : AIR1960All247

served upon the petitioner to show cause why the permit be not cancelled under Section 60 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioner submitted an explanation dated 22-9-1956 and the matter was considered by the Regional Transport Authority in … the ground of suppression or concealment of material facts or of misstatement of facts.13. Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act make a provision for an appeal against an order of the Regional Transport Authority cancelling or suspending the

Prakash Chandra Vishnu Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor VehiclesConstitution

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(8), 2(33), 52, 53(2) and 68; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 94; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1959All373

on 7-9-1955. It is valid upto 6-9-1958. In the permit that was granted to this petitioner under the Motor Vehicles Act two conditions amongst others were provided, firstly, with regard to the nature of the goods to be carried … returns, the complaint is that this is not required by any rules framed under Section 68 of the Motor Vehicles Act and in their absence a condition in that behalf is illegal.The reliefs asked in the two petitions accordingly

Smt. Lagana Devi and ors. Vs. Lila Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96 and 96(2)

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas814(Raj); 1985WLN(UC)310

P.C. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the judgment and award dated February 5, 1981, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bikaner, … compensation in view of the provisions contained in Sub-clause (2) of Sub-section (2)(b) of Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act.4. Shri P.K. Bhansali, appearing on behalf of the insurance company, has seriously contested the submissions made by learned

Ahmad HusaIn Vs. Rama Shankar Misra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 59(2) and 60(1)

Reported in : AIR1960All435

to the respondent firm to show cause why its permit be not cancelled under Section 60 of the Motor Vehicles Act on the ground of the complaint made by the appellant on 9-7-1956. The res-non-dent firm filed its objection … on the grounds, among others, that the permit could not have been cancelled under Section 60[l)fc) of the Motor Vehicles Act in the absence of a finding that the respondent firm had ceased to possess the vehicle covered by

Sunil Suman Kaushik Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(28)

Reported in : (1997)115PLR224

& Commissioner, Department of Transport, Haryana and State Transport Commissioner, Haryana, to comply with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with regard to the fitness and emission of smoke etc. from the State Transport Vehicles and other … a prayer was made for issuance of directions to the respondents to comply with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act with regard to fit-ness and emission of smoke etc. and taking appropriate action by preventing the plying of

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. AllahdIn and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66, 140, 145, 147, 147(1), 149, 149(2), 170, 173 and 192; ;Motor vehicles Act, 1939

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ698

terms and conditions of the insurance policy read with the mandate of Sections 147 and 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act in the given circumstances of the case(s).3. If issues 1 and 3 are decided against the insurer then … return a finding on the question formulated hereinabove, it is necessary to notice Section 149 Sub-clause (2) of Motor Vehicles Act herein which reads an under.No sum shall be payable by an insurer under Sub-section (1) in respect of

Yalaguradappa S/O Rangappa Chalawadi Vs. Ramesh S/O Basappa Biradar

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

then it is a violation of use of vehicle with respect to all. Further, Section 149(2)(a)(i)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 says that, if the vehicle is used for hire or reward against the condition of the policy, … the time of accident, the insurer can be exonerated from its liability as per Section 149(2)(a)(i)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. However, in the instant case, the insurer cannot be discharged in simpliciter for the reason that the

iffco Tokio General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Pratima Jha

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Education

the vehicle was not registered with the transport authorities. This amounted to violation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was considered a violation of the terms of the insurance policy by the Insurance Co. 2. … claim was as per the conditions of the policy. The insurance policy operated under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. According to the OP, the vehicle remained unregistered and the Complainant continued to use it without proper registration.

M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 16, 16(1) to 16(4), 16(5), 16(6), 16(7), 16(8), 18(1), 20A, 20A(3), 20B, 20B(4), 20C, 24, 24(2), 28, 44(2A), 45 and 88(9); The Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1999 - Sections 1(2), 3(1), 20A, 20B and 20C; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(7), 2(40), 2(43), 66, 66(1), 66(2), 66(3), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 88, 130(4) and 177 to 210; Government of India Act - Sections 107(2); Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 7(1); Bombay Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1950; The Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 - Sections 20; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7A(3); Travan

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT15

he is satisfied that the owner has committed offence under Section 66 read with Section 192A of the Motor Vehicles Act. Sub-section (7) prescribes safeguards before order of confiscation is passed. Sub-section (8) of Section 16 further provides safeguard … (3) is satisfied that the owner has committed offence under Section 66 read with Section 192A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 of plying Vehicle without permit (and) he may by order in writing and for reasons to be