Advanced Search Results

Rangasamy Vs. Periammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1991ACJ45

V. Ratnam, J.1. This appeal, under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, has been preferred by the owner of the vehicle against the award of the Motor Accidents

Rama Shanker Misra and Brothers Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Kanp ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(20), 59, 59(1), 59(2), 60(1) and 68(1); Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rules 63 and 64

Reported in : AIR1960All247

consequently be void, but the transfer of a permit is different from the transfer of ownership of the motor vehicle, or the transfer of a right to a share in the profits from the business of plying a … the petitioner to show cause why the permit be not cancelled under Section 60 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioner submitted an explanation dated 22-9-1956 and the matter was considered by the Regional Transport Authority in

Prakash Chandra Vishnu Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor VehiclesConstitution

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(8), 2(33), 52, 53(2) and 68; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 94; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1959All373

on 7-9-1955. It is valid upto 6-9-1958. In the permit that was granted to this petitioner under the Motor Vehicles Act two conditions amongst others were provided, firstly, with regard to the nature of the goods to … are that a permanent private carrier permit No. 40 was granted to the concerned petitioner for a transport vehicle No. U. P. Y. 574 on 7-9-1955. It is valid upto 6-9-1958. In the permit that was granted

Smt. Lagana Devi and ors. Vs. Lila Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96 and 96(2)

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas814(Raj); 1985WLN(UC)310

P.C. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the judgment and award dated February 5, 1981, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims … P.C. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the judgment and award dated February 5, 1981, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Ahmad HusaIn Vs. Rama Shankar Misra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 59(2) and 60(1)

Reported in : AIR1960All435

to the respondent firm to show cause why its permit be not cancelled under Section 60 of the Motor Vehicles Act on the ground of the complaint made by the appellant on 9-7-1956. The res-non-dent firm filed … the Mahoba-Rajnagar route. The permit was valid up to the 4th October, 1958. Originally the permit related to vehicle No. U. P. R. 4801 but in July, 1952, the respondent firm got that vehicle replaced by another

Sunil Suman Kaushik Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(28)

Reported in : (1997)115PLR224

vehicle fitted with an engine. Under sub section (28) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, motor vehicle has been defined as follows:-'2(28) 'motor vehicles or 'vehicle' means any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. AllahdIn and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66, 140, 145, 147, 147(1), 149, 149(2), 170, 173 and 192; ;Motor vehicles Act, 1939

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ698

these contentions were raised earlier before the learned Single Bench in earlier said appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act and therefore, the LPA bench against the judgment of learned Single Judge. However, these contentions were turned down

Yalaguradappa S/O Rangappa Chalawadi Vs. Ramesh S/O Basappa Biradar

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

are with respect to a same road traffic accident said to have been occurred on 11.11.2005 involving a motor vehicle bearing registration No.KA-28/M-4230. As such, all these matters are connected and heard together and being taken up to … ... RESPONDENTS (SRI.H.M.DHARIGOND, ADV. FOR R1, SRI.S.S.KOLIWAD, ADV. FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD :01-12-2010 PASSED IN MVC NO.1541/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL.

iffco Tokio General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Pratima Jha

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Education

of the RTO, Raipur, vide document Annexure-A4. This document shows that under the provisions of Section 25 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, the vehicle in question was got registered under a temporary registration and registration NO.C.G.04 5651/TR was allotted … Registered in the Office of the Registering Authority. Thus there was no violation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 in this regard.? 6. Thus, the District Forum as well as the State Commission have both given

M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 16, 16(1) to 16(4), 16(5), 16(6), 16(7), 16(8), 18(1), 20A, 20A(3), 20B, 20B(4), 20C, 24, 24(2), 28, 44(2A), 45 and 88(9); The Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1999 - Sections 1(2), 3(1), 20A, 20B and 20C; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(7), 2(40), 2(43), 66, 66(1), 66(2), 66(3), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 88, 130(4) and 177 to 210; Government of India Act - Sections 107(2); Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 7(1); Bombay Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1950; The Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 - Sections 20; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7A(3); Travan

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT15

limited extent, before we proceed to consider the difference between the two provisions i.e. Section 192A of the Motor Vehicle Act and Section 16 (6) of the Karadhan Adhiniyam, it would be apt to note down the law laid