Advanced Search Results

The Management of Proteck Circuits and Systems Private Limited Vs. Con ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(2); Limitation Act - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ585(NULL)

of 2372 days was resisted by the petitioner management on the ground that as per Proviso (2) to Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the application ought to have been presented within six months from … according to the petitioner, has less than 60 workmen, filed a petition before the first respondent under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, by raising a contention that the workers in the list annexed therein have received wages less than the

Pali Devi and Others Vs. Chairman, Managing Committee and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(2); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)650; AIR1996SC1589; [1996(73)FLR1150]; JT1996(3)SC306; 1996LabIC1273; (1996)IILLJ57SC; 1996(2)SCALE633; (1996)3SCC296; [1996]2SCR752; 1996(1)LC803(SC); (1996)3U

of the respondent Managing Committee of the Army School, Jalandhar, upsetting the orders of the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, on the premise that the appellants seeking relief were its ex-employees and not existing ones, and hence disentitled … Ors. : (1965)IILLJ307Kant . Thus on account of the preponderance of authority, Sections 20(2) and 2(i) had to be read alongwith the Rules and Form … seeking relief were its ex-employees and not existing ones, and hence disentitled to move a petition under Section 20(2) of the Act for appropriate relief.2. The employees voiced grievance before the Authority that the Army School had

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13, 14(1) and 20(2); Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rules 2, 7(3), 42 and 43; Rajasthan Minimum Wages Rules - Rule 26; Garden, Irrigation, Water Works and Ayurved Subordinate Work Charge Employees Service Rules, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 23 and 309

Reported in : 2000(1)WLC546; 2003(2)WLN232

has been filed by the State challenging the order dated 31.5.99 passed by the Prescribed Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter called as the Act 1948) allowing the claim of overtime of the respondent-workman.2. The facts and circumstances … Rules, 1951') in accordance with the provisions of rule 2 thereof. A claim petition under Sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the Act 1948 was filed before respondent No. 2-Prescribed Authority claiming overtime on the ground that

Scantec (India) Private Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Shri S.K. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20, 20(1), 20(2) and 20(3); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1956 - Rule 29(4)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3893; (2010)ILLJ477Bom

- Payment of short wages - Person entitled to raise claim of payment of short wages - Section 20 (2) of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Petitioner challenged order of Respondent-Authority directing Petitioner to deposit compensation and difference … 3. None present for the respondent No. 1 & 2.2. Petitioner has challenged the order of Authority under Minimum Wages Act 1948 and the Regional Labour (C) Nagpur dated 15.1.1998 by which the petitioner was ordered to deposit the difference … inference - Petition allowed - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894]. Sections 23 & 24; [Swatanter Kumar, CJ, N.V. Dabholkar & M.G.Gaikwad, JJ] Determination

Project Technologists Pvt. Ltd. Vs. P.C. Bhargava and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(2) and 20(3)

Reported in : (1998)1GLR700

There will be no order as to costs. 14. Petition allowed. Labour and Industrial - minimum wages - Sections 20 (2) and 20 (3) of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - finding of non payment of minimum wages and imposition … the respondents. The matter has been pending since then. It is a matter concerning the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. It is desirable that it be disposed of at the earliest. Hence, Rule. The same is made returnable

Birla Institute of Technology Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1-A) and 20(2)

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR358(Jhr)]; (2007)ILLJ963Jhar

petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 29.07.1997 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act').2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the learned Appellate Authority … were considered by the Assistant Labour Commissioner.3. The claim applications were filed before the Assistant Labour Commissioner under Section 20(2) of the said Act by the workmen of Birla Institute of Technology through their Legal Advisor and

Basavaraj Chenna Naik Vs. General Manager

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(1) and 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2172; 1985(2)KarLJ371

Mis. No. 16/82 dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioners and several others under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'). I shall refer to the parties in the course of this order as they … ORDERNarayana Rai Kudoor, J.1. This Criminal Revision under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') is directed against the Judgment and order

M/S Tops Security Ltd. Vs. Tops Detective and Secuirty Services Ltd. K ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 19th January, 2012 of the Authority appointed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 allowing the application of the respondent Union under Section 20 of the Act for release of difference of … of the Authority appointed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 allowing the application of the respondent Union under Section 20 of the Act for release of difference of minimum wages and wages paid for the period 1st … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h January, 2014 % + LPA No.407/2013, CM No.1673/2014 (for amendment in appeal) & CM

Union of India Owning and Representating the Central Railway Administr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20 and 20(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1969Bom310; (1968)70BOMLR548; 1968MhLJ771

and prohibition, praying for quashing of two orders made by the Respondent No. 1 the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, for Neral area. The said authority is also the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba District. … Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba District. The respondents Nos. 2 to 201 are alleged to have been employed with the Central Railway Administration during … to this contention of exclusive use are that in some countries like Holland roads are divided into three sections. One part has railway tracks laid on it, the other part is allotted to cyclists and on the

Executive Engineer (Training), Cpwd Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 20(2) and 22; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 25; ;Minimum Wages (Central) (Amendment) Rules, 1960 - Rule 25; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1967

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)216; 96(2002)DLT721; [2002(93)FLR1230]; (2002)IILLJ360Del

for quashing the order dated 17.6.2000 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner, New Delhi, an authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). 4. Respondent No. 2 was appointed as Chowkidar with CPWD on … Superintending Engineers/Executive Engineers.' 5. The claim of respondent No. 2 filed under Section 20 (2) of the said Act claiming over time has been allowed … in the offices of the Superintending Engineers/Executive Engineers.' 5. The claim of respondent No. 2 filed under Section 20 (2) of the said Act claiming over time has been allowed by the impugned order. The Regional Labour Commissioner