Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 section 29 · Page 1 of about 690 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 22 1961

Management of the Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-22-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29, 33-C(1), 33-C(2) and 36-A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : AIR1962Mad335; (1962)ILLJ493Mad

(2) and 36A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Article 226 of Constitution of India, Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 15 of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - petition seeking quashing of Order … to interpret an award or a settlement for the purpose of removing any difficulty or doubt therein, and section 29 provides for another mode of enforcement by prescribing a penalty for breach of a settlement or an award.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1968

The Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Nippani Vs. Ramachandra Dat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-05-1968

Subject : Labour and IndustrialLimitation

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(1), 20(2) and 29(3); Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 102; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2); Indian Companies Act - Sections 186(1)

Reported in : AIR1969Kant202; AIR1969Mys202; [1968(17)FLR430]; ILR1968KAR380

Council, Nippani, in the District of Belgaum, to quash an order made by the Authority functioning under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 under Section 29(3) of that Act directing the Municipal Council to pay a sum of Rs. 7959-54 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1997

Surya Rau V. V., E.D. Nocil and Others Vs. Surendra Ramkrishna Tendulk ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour Act - Sections 7, 18, 21, 21(4), 27, 29 and 30; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 7(1) and 18; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 19(4), 20, 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 22C, 22C(1), 22C(2), 22D, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)505; (1998)ILLJ629Bom; 1998(3)MhLj281

Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28 of the Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963. Apart from the … that it is the Contractor who has to maintain the Registers/Records as he is the employer and under Section 29 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, every principal employer and every contractor shall maintain such Registers/Records

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 10 2001

Modern theatres Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-10-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3A, 3(2), 5, 12 and 25; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19(3), 19(6), 23 and 29

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1148]; (2002)IIILLJ41Mad

the Minimum Wages Act was published fixing the rates of wages for employees in the cinema industry.4. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was enacted to provide for fixing the minimum rate of wages in certain employments. Section 12 of the … the clear language found in Sub-clause (6) of Section 19 of the Industrial Disputes Act read along with Section 29 of that Act, the term 'operation' used in Sub-section (2A) of Section 3 of the Minimum Wages Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Jal S ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2A), 3(27), 4(1), 7A, 10, 10(l), 10(4), 14 and 33(1); Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961 - Rules 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 22, 27, 28, 29 and 30; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1975; Gujarat Civil Services Rules (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1998; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(9); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 309

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2515

in the whole State or part thereof.'8.4I The learned advocate has also relied upon Section 27 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, which reads as under:'Sec. 27 Power of State Government to add to Schedule:- The appropriate Government after giving … the State be deemed to be amended accordingly.'8.4J Section 28 provides power of Central Government to give directions. Section 29 provides power of the Central Government to make rules. Section 30 provides power of appropriate Government to make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2003

O.P. Ali Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-02-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 22B and 22B(1); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 29(1) and 29(2); Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Rules, 1958

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ208Ker

35997/2000, 1363/2001 and 18916/2001 are dismissed. Labour and Industrial - application - Sections 22B and 22B (1) of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Rule 29 (1) and 29 (2) of Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 and Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and … to be quashed. Complaints were filed by the Assistant Labour Officers, who, according to them were authorised under Section 19 of the Minimum Wages Act to function as Inspectors. Section 19 authorises the Government, by notification in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2016

Dr. Digambareppa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Mar-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.4435/2014 pending on the file of Principal JMFC-II Court, Raichur, for the offences punishable under sections 22 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and for violation of Rules 22(4), 28(2), 29(1) and 29(5) of the Minimum Wages Rule, 1950. 4. The … proceedings in C.C. No.4435/2014 pending on the file of Principal JMFC-II Court, Raichur, for the offences punishable under sections 22 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and for violation of Rules 22(4), 28(2), 29(1) and 29(5) of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2006

Gajraj Singh Son of Sri Attar Singh and Meerut-rohata-barnava-binauli- ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-23-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 61, 63, 84 and 255; Indian tolls (Army and Air Force) Act, 1901 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 2(9), 128, 128(1) and 128(2); Indian Tolls Act, 1851 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 55 to 100; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 37; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 29(2); Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 172, 172(1) and 172(2); Constitution of India - Artic

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2915

in this Act shall have the same meaning for the purpose of this Act as defined in the Minimum Wages Act of 1948. According to the learned Counsel, this shows that this was really a dependent and no independent … and Ors. (Pr.7)7. It was then contended on behalf of the respondents, though faintly, that by reason of Section 29, Sub-section (2), the Indian Succession Act, 1925 must be deemed to have adopted by reference all laws for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2009

K.K. Ahuja Vs. V.K. Vora and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141, 141(1) and 141(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(24), 2(45), 5 and 291; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 278B; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 22C; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 86A; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14A; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 29; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 40; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 47

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2897; 2009(4)BomCR558; [2009]152CompCas520(SC); JT2009(8)SC691; 2010(1)MPHT164; 2009(II)OLR(SC)292; RLW2009(9)SC2275; 2009(9)SCALE87; (2009)10SCC48; [2009]94SCL; 2009(4)LHSC2621; [2009] 9 SCR 1144

by companies, to mention a few - Section 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 86A of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14A of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, … of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14A of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Section 29 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Section 40 of The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2010

K. Chinnusamy and ors. Vs. S.S. Dye Chem

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 278B; ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Section 22C; ;Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 86A; ;Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 14A; ;Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Section 29; ;Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Section 40; ;Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Section 47; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(24), 2(26), 2(30), 2(31), 2(45), 5 and 291; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482

Reported in : [2010]155CompCas228(Mad)

with offences by companies, to mention a few--Section 278B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 22C of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 86A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions … the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Section 29 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Section 40 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial