Advanced Search Results

Jyothi Home Industries Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5(1), 5(2), 12(1), 13(1), 14, 15, 17, 20, 20(1), 22D, 22F, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 13, 15, 20, 25(C), 25-F, 25-FF and 25-FFF; Constitution of India - Article 43; Catering Wages Act, 1943; Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ201Kant

they relate to a notification issued by the State Government under the provisions of S. 3 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (in short the Act). 2. W.P. No. 20889 of 1982, though not fixed for hearing, was brought up … out-worker or in some other premises not being premises under the control and management of that other person.19. Section 22D of the Act reads : 'All amounts payable by an employer to an employee as the amount of

Surya Rau V. V., E.D. Nocil and Others Vs. Surendra Ramkrishna Tendulk ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour Act - Sections 7, 18, 21, 21(4), 27, 29 and 30; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 7(1) and 18; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 19(4), 20, 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 22C, 22C(1), 22C(2), 22D, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)505; (1998)ILLJ629Bom; 1998(3)MhLj281

Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28 of the Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963. Apart from the … petitioner in the Court of the 1st Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

the argument on behalf of Union of India was that the orders passed by the authorities under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 should be quashed and set aside. The facts have been noted in para 2 of this judgment. The … the Hon ble Gujarat High Court centered around the interpretation of Item 22D and Item 68 in the first Schedule of the Central Excise Act, … as to why service tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under

Rajasthan Minerals and Company Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Act a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(2)

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ261Raj

of Rs. 9, 168.45 as difference-amount of wages (minimum paid) and Rs. 73,347.60 as compensation under Section 20, Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the Act') and also order dated August 25, 1988 (Annexure 3) of the Authority dismissing the … same or balance will be deposited within four months from today with the Prescribed Authority as required under Section 22D of the Act. If the aforesaid amount is neither paid nor deposited within the specified time as said,