Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 section 22b · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.013 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 1963

State Vs. Mohanlal Devichand Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1963

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(2), 18, 19, 22, 22A, 22B, 22B(1) and 27

Reported in : AIR1964Bom67; (1963)65BOMLR245; 1964CriLJ330; [1963(6)FLR407]; ILR1963Bom631; (1963)IILLJ241Bom

No. 4 to 6 (case No. 763 of 1961), under S. 22A read with S. 18 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. 3. The accused contended that it was not necessary to keep the registers on the workspot, nor was … shall exercise their functions. Sub-section (2) of the said section defines the power of the inspector so appointed. Section 22B relates to the cognizance of offences. Sub-section (1)(b) is relevant for our purposes, and it runs thus :

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1994

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Shri Sankeshwar JaIn Agam Mandir

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-10-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 13, 20, 22, 22A, 22B, 22B(2) and 30

Reported in : (1996)1GLR287

Judge was pleased to hold that the complaint filed by the Labour Inspector under Section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was barred by limitation, and as a consequence to set aside the order passed by the learned J.M.F.C., … the relevant provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, is necessary for apprehending this error. Sections 22, 22A, and 22B of the Act, read as Under : '22. Penalties for certain offence :- Any employer who - (a)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1961

Bidi, Bidi Leaves' and Tobacco Merchants Association Vs. the State of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7, 12, 12(2), 18, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 22B; Constitution of India - Articles 132(1) and 133(1); State Reorganisation Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1962SC486; [1962(4)FLR71]; (1961)IILLJ663SC; [1962]Supp1SCR381

issued by the State of Bombay, now represented by the State of Maharashtra, under s. 5 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Section 5 (11 of 1948) (hereafter called the Act). The petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 205 … other penalty is provided for such contravention, be punishable with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees. Section 22B provides, inter alia the manner in which Courts may take cognizance of a complaint against any person for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 2005

Mahesh Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-09-2005

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1), 13(1), 14, 18, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 22, 22A, 22B(1) and 22B(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468 and 482

and where under the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance of offence under Sections 12(1) and 18 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 ('1948 Act', in short). The complaint at Annexure-1 was filed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Muzaffarpur against the … August 8, 2001, beyond a period of six months. As submitted, Section 22B(2) of the 1948 Act bars cognizance of an offence under Clause (a) … P.K. Sinha, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code', in short) has been filed by the petitioners for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2006

R.T. Singh and M.K. Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Shri Umsesh P ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-12-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1), 18, 19, 20B, 22A, 22B and 22B(1); Minimum Wages Rules, 1950 - Rules 21(4), 22, 25(2), 26, 26(1), 26(2) and 26(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4494; [2006(111)FLR381]; [2006(3)JCR33(Jhr)]; (2006)IIILLJ878Jhar

impugned dated 26.8.2002 whereby and whereunder the C.J.M., Jamshedpur took cognizance of the offence under Section 22A of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in C/2 Case No. 2006/2002 pending in the Court of Miss Shweta … the cognizance of the offence was taken by the C.J.M. on 26.8.2002 which is bad in law under Section 22B(1)(a). The prosecution of the petitioners, is therefore, not maintainable either in law or on facts and that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2003

O.P. Ali Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-02-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 22B and 22B(1); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 29(1) and 29(2); Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Rules, 1958

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ208Ker

35997/2000, 1363/2001 and 18916/2001 are dismissed. Labour and Industrial - application - Sections 22B and 22B (1) of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Rule 29 (1) and 29 (2) of Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 and Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and … to be quashed. Complaints were filed by the Assistant Labour Officers, who, according to them were authorised under Section 19 of the Minimum Wages Act to function as Inspectors. Section 19 authorises the Government, by notification in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2010

SachIn Kumar Tulsiyan. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-06-2010

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 22A, 22B(2)(b)

. By the said order, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance under Section 22A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.2. Short fact of the case is that on 25.9.2001, an inspection was conducted by the Labour Superintendent-cum- … challenging the order of cognizance submits that the order of cognizance is barred under the provisions contained in Section 22B(2)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act. It was submitted that there is statutory provision for filing complaint within six

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1975

State of Rajasthan Vs. Bhawani Shanker Bus Service and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-1975

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1975WLN(UC)461

Sodani made a complaint against the respondents Bhawani Shanker and others under Sections 22 and 22B of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The case was registered on January 22, 1970. All the accused were served by February 6, 1970. On … on account of the default in appearance of the complainant Labour Inspector, Dungarpur and acquitting the accused under Section 247 Cr.P.C.2. The material facts are that the Labour Inspector, Dungarpur Radheyshyam Sodani made a complaint against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2010

G. Sukumar Vs. the Competent Authority Under Minimum Wages Act Cum Dep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20, 22B(1) and 22B(2)

the Assistant Inspector of Labour, Cuddalore filed an application before the first respondent under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for brevity, 'the Act'). The Authority held that the petitioner has not been paying minimum wages to the … well satisfied the authority about the payment of the amount to the third respondent. Even otherwise, under Section 22B(2) of the Act, no court can take cognizance of an offence unless an application is filed within one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1964

State of Mysore Vs. Mensinakal (S.P.)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-30-1964

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(1A), 22A, 22B(2) and 27

Reported in : [1966(12)FLR179]; (1967)ILLJ87Kant

order of acquittal made by a Magistrate of Haveri in a prosecution commenced under S. 22A of the Minimum Wages Act (Central Act 11 of 1948). 2. The accused was the secretary of the Haveri Municipality, Haveri, constituted under … part to obey the rules. It is the correctness of this view which requires investigation in this appeal. Section 2(e) of the Act defines an employer thus : '(e) 'employer' means any person who employs, whether directly … too late and beyond the period of six months prescribed by S. 22B(2)(b) of the Act, was the next submission made. Section 22B(2)(b) provides that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial