Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 section 22 · Page 1 of about 873 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 03 1997

Surya Rau V. V., E.D. Nocil and Others Vs. Surendra Ramkrishna Tendulk ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour Act - Sections 7, 18, 21, 21(4), 27, 29 and 30; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 7(1) and 18; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 19(4), 20, 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 22C, 22C(1), 22C(2), 22D, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)505; (1998)ILLJ629Bom; 1998(3)MhLj281

Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28 of the Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963. Apart from the … petitioner in the Court of the 1st Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2006

R.T. Singh and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-15-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1), 18, 19, 22A, 22B and 22B(1); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules 1950- Rules 21(4), 22, 25(2), 26, 26(1), 26(2) and 26(5)

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR360(Jhr)]

dated 26.8.2002 whereby and whereunder the CJM Jamshedpur took cognizance of the offence under Section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in C/2 case No. 2007/02 now pending in the Court of Miss

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1962

Union of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830

Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. … Government, if such wages fixed by the latter law are higher than those fixed by the former one. Section 22 lays down penalties for breach of some of the provisions of the said Act by employers. For example,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 2004

Dr. Miss Sudha Jhingon Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-21-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2004(3)BLJR1856; 2005CriLJ62; [2005(104)FLR503]; (2005)ILLJ903Jhar

No. 48 of 2002, as contained in Annexure-6.2. The prosecution case in brief is that complainant-Labour Superintendent-cum-Inspector under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Chaibasa after taking sanction under Section 22(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 filed a complaint before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2006

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(3), 2(4), 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25F and 170B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; Security Guards Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abo

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

(2) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (3) The Factories Act, 1948, (4) The Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, (5) Minimum Wages Act, 1948, (6) The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, (7) The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and … Scheme framed thereunder and thus those better benefits are fully protected under Section 21. It is submitted that Section 22 of the Mathadi Act provides for exemption by the Government if the employers can establish that they have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2002

Executive Engineer (Training), Cpwd Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 20(2) and 22; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 25; ;Minimum Wages (Central) (Amendment) Rules, 1960 - Rule 25; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1967

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)216; 96(2002)DLT721; [2002(93)FLR1230]; (2002)IILLJ360Del

for quashing the order dated 17.6.2000 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner, New Delhi, an authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). 4. Respondent No. 2 was appointed as Chowkidar with CPWD on … We have not been shown any other provision under which they can claim overtime. 5. The application under Section 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, is, thereforee, misconceived. The respondents seem to have proceeded on the basis that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1990

State of Gujarat Vs. Sthanakvasi JaIn Mota Sangh and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-25-1990

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 18 and 22; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4)

Reported in : (1992)1GLR19; (1995)IIILLJ519Guj

question of importance that arises for consideration in these two acquittal appeals is 'whether the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act') and the Rules made thereunder, viz. Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961 (for short 'the … in Form No. V-A to employees under Rule 26B - which are offences under Section 18 punishable under Section 22 of the Act. On making further inquiries from the pay-register, it was found put that two of its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1990

State of Gujarat Vs. Krishna Engineering Works

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-11-1990

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12 and 18; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 252

Reported in : (1991)2GLR744; (1999)IIILLJ401Guj

Engineering Works' which came to be prosecuted for the alleged offence under Sections 18 and 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short referred to as 'the Act') in respect of the contravention of Rules 22, 26-A, 26-B, 26-D … Gandevi, wherein the respondent The Krishna Engineering Works' which came to be prosecuted for the alleged offence under Sections 18 and 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short referred to as 'the Act') in respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1962

Union of India Vs. Rathi B.D.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ655Bom

Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … Government, if such wages fixed by the latter law are higher than those fixed by the former one. Section 22 lays down penalties for breach of some of the provisions of the said Act by employers. For example,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1973

Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, Nagpur Vs. Regional Director, Regional O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-05-1973

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(22), 39, 73A, 75, 76 and 81; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14 and 14(2)

Reported in : (1974)ILLJ453Bom; 1973MhLJ1037

of this reference. (i) Labour and Industrial - overtime wages - Sections 2 (22) of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Section 59 of Factories Act, 1948 - whether wages defined under … according to him the normal wages, which in the instant case were fixed under the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. According to him, the first part of the definition does not cover payment which is made to an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial