Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 section 2 · Page 1 of about 1,574 results (0.108 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 1958

Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-1958

Subject : Labour and IndustrialArbitration

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 12, 12(2), 20, 20(2), 21 and 30(2); State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 122; Industrial Arbitration Act, 1901; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 30; Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidis (Agriculture Purposes) Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 4; Indian Contract Act - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 43, 168, 224(1), 226, 227 and 723; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR890; (1959)IILLJ286Bom

issued by the Government of Bombay in Labour and Social Welfare Department, dated 11 June, 1958, under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. That notification runs thus : 'No. MWA. 1557-J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1993

Rasheed A. Maskati and ors. Vs. Abbas Ali Hussaini M. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-09-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 2 and 2(4)

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ331Bom

Respondent No. 1 filed application No. 28 of 1985 in the Court of Competent Authority appointed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. By the said application, respondent No. 1 claimed difference in minimum wages payable under Item 17 Part-I of … provisions of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 did not apply; that respondent No. 1 was not an employee under Section 2(i) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948; that appellants did not carry on any organised or systematic activity to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1962

Union of India Vs. Rathi B.D.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ655Bom

Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … the facts in these application, is would be necessary to note the relevant provisions of the said Act. Section 2(b) defines the expression 'appropriate Government,' and according to that definition, in relation to any scheduled employment carried

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 07 1968

Union of India Vs. Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1968

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(2), 12, 13, 14, 18, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : [1968(17)FLR266]; (1968)IILLJ750Bom

of certiorari and prohibition, praying for quashing of two orders made by respondent 1, the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, for Neral area. The said authority is also the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba district. … its preamble states that it is an Act to provide for minimum rates of wages in certain employments. Section 2(b) defined the expression 'appropriate Government' as meaning : 'in relation to any scheduled employment carried on by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1983

Ram Kumar Misra Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-1983

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1) and 3(1A); Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953 - Sections 2(6); Minimum Wages (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : AIR1984SC537; [1984(49)FLR163]; 1984LabIC297; 1983(2)SCALE975; (1984)2SCC451; [1983]3SCR1011; 1984(16)LC53(SC)

respondent No. 5 were not being paid minimum wages as prescribed by the relevant notification issued under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The wages of the workmen employed in these two ferries were given in the annexure to the letter … the two ferries with effect from 20th January, 1979, that being the date when the notification issued under Section 3(1)(a) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was amended so as to make the minimum wage applicable to … letter was treated as a writ petition and by an order dated 25th January, 1983, this Court issued notice on the writ petition and on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Lubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ122Guj

and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly … under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. He also submits that the incentives are also satisfying the ingredients of Section 2(h) of the Minimum Wages Act wherein 'wages' have been defined under the Act. According to his submission, Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1987

Ramakant Rajmangal Yadav Vs. Ramnilan Vijay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-1987

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Minimum of Wages Act, 1948; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(K)

Reported in : (1987)89BOMLR538; (1993)IIILLJ692Bom; 1987MhLJ994

purview of an Engineering Industry and as per a notification issued by the Government of Maharashtra under the Minimum wages Act, 1948, prescribing the minimum wages for the Engineering Industry with effect from 1st Dec., 1974, they be paid the … the expression 'manufacturing process' shall have the same meaning as is assigned to it in Clause (k) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948.' Mr. Cama vehemently urges that this Entry is divided into two parts that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1964

Chairman, Panihati Municipality Vs. Secretary, Panihati Municipal Labo ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-11-1964

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7A(1), 10 and 36; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 20 and 34; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965Cal229

awarding the difference between the minimum wages and the wages actually paid.16. Section 20, Sub-section (1) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 provides as follows:'The appropriate Govt. may..... appoint any Commissioner for workmen's compensation...... onany other officer with experience as … A.C. Sen, J. 1. The present application under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the award given by Sri P. K. Sarkar, Judge, Second Industrial Tribunal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2006

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, represented by Its Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-29-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(19A), 5, 12, 20, 27, 72, 73, 74 and 79A; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act, 1966; Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1968 - Rule 79; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

a Union. Through their Union they filed an application before the competent authority under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for short 'the Act'. They contend that the APMC Yard is their employer within the meaning of Section1948 for short 'the Act'. They contend that the APMC Yard is their employer within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act. In the schedule attached to the application they have given the particulars of wages paid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1962

Union of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830

Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. … of Employment) Rules 1951.' The point that was urged before the Authority was that the rules framed under Section 71E of the Indian Railways Act provide for the remuneration, i.e., wages, payable to employees, including wages for … that these Special Civil Applications are preferred to this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.3. Mr. Parikh, who appears for the Central Railway, contends

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial