Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 section 14 · Page 1 of about 1,159 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2002

State of Gujarat Vs. Savailal H. Shah

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-27-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR395]; (2003)IILLJ641Guj

99,736.54 ps. to the respondent being the amount of overtime wages as contemplated by Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The facts, as they emerge from the record of the case, may be briefly stated:The respondent was employed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2002

Pune Municipal Corporation Vs. Suryakant Pandurang Dharwad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-12-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Minimum Wages (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR7; [2002(95)FLR559]; 2002(4)MhLj56

Establishments Act, According to Shri Ketkar, in reply to the submissions of Ms. Sarnaik, the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 were also not applicable. He submitted that there was absolutely no pleading or averments in the application to … were called upon to work overtime. According to the learned Advocate, the claim of the employees was under Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act. The Learned Advocate in support of her claim relied upon a judgment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Jal S ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2A), 3(27), 4(1), 7A, 10, 10(l), 10(4), 14 and 33(1); Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961 - Rules 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 22, 27, 28, 29 and 30; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1975; Gujarat Civil Services Rules (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1998; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(9); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 309

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2515

in the whole State or part thereof.'8.4I The learned advocate has also relied upon Section 27 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, which reads as under:'Sec. 27 Power of State Government to add to Schedule:- The appropriate Government after giving … and in para 4 and 5 the Hon'ble Apex Court observed as under:'There is also an amendment to Section 14 by addition of sub-section (1-a) under the Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 being Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 1998

Municipal Council Hatta Vs. Bhagat Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 22; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 95; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Service (Scales of Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1967

Reported in : AIR1998SC1201; [1998(79)FLR338]; RLW1998(2)SC196; 1998(1)SCALE494; (1998)2SCC443

respondents contended that they would be entitled to overtime under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 by virtue of Section 14 of the said Act. According to them, service with Local Authority is one of the employments covered by … who are Moharirs/peons working with the appellant Municipal Council, Hatta, filed an application under Section 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, before the Competent Authority (Labour Court) under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for payment of overtime on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1998

Municipal Council, Hatta Vs. Bhagat Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-05-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR86(SC)]; JT1998(1)SC529; (1998)ILLJ815SC; [1998]1SCR699; 1998(1)LC422(SC)

respondents contended that they would be entitled to overtime under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 by virtue of Section 14 of the said Act. According to them, service with Local Authority is one of the employment covered by … who are Moharrirs/peons working with the appellant Municipal Council, Hatta, filed an application under Section 22 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, before the Competent Authority (Labour Court) under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for payment of overtime on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2002

Executive Engineer (Training), Cpwd Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 20(2) and 22; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 25; ;Minimum Wages (Central) (Amendment) Rules, 1960 - Rule 25; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1967

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)216; 96(2002)DLT721; [2002(93)FLR1230]; (2002)IILLJ360Del

for quashing the order dated 17.6.2000 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner, New Delhi, an authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). 4. Respondent No. 2 was appointed as Chowkidar with CPWD on … The Supreme Court in the said judgment has observed that : '4. There is also an amendment to Section 14 by addition of Sub-section (1-a) under the Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 being act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1962

Union of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830

Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. … reference to the natural of their employment, such as employees doing emergency work or whose employment is intermittent. Section 14 deals with overtime wages in the case of those employees, whose minimum rate of wages is fixed under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1968

Union of India Vs. Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1968

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(2), 12, 13, 14, 18, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : [1968(17)FLR266]; (1968)IILLJ750Bom

of certiorari and prohibition, praying for quashing of two orders made by respondent 1, the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, for Neral area. The said authority is also the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba district. … its preamble states that it is an Act to provide for minimum rates of wages in certain employments. Section 2(b) defined the expression 'appropriate Government' as meaning : 'in relation to any scheduled employment carried on by … the Act fixes the hours for a normal working day and S. 14 provides for payment for overtime and states that where as employee, whose

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1962

Union of India Vs. Rathi B.D.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ655Bom

Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … reference to the nature of their employment, such as employees doing emergency work or whose employment is intermittent. Section 14 deals with overtime wages in the case of those employees, whose minimum rates of wages is fixed under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1973

Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, Nagpur Vs. Regional Director, Regional O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-05-1973

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(22), 39, 73A, 75, 76 and 81; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14 and 14(2)

Reported in : (1974)ILLJ453Bom; 1973MhLJ1037

of this reference. (i) Labour and Industrial - overtime wages - Sections 2 (22) of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Section 59 of Factories Act, 1948 - whether wages defined under Section … according to him the normal wages, which in the instant case were fixed under the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. According to him, the first part of the definition does not cover payment which is made to an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial