Advanced Search Results
State of Rajasthan Vs. Mohan Singh and anr.
Rajasthan
May-15-2001
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13, 14(1) and 20(2); Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rules 2, 7(3), 42 and 43; Rajasthan Minimum Wages Rules - Rule 26; Garden, Irrigation, Water Works and Ayurved Subordinate Work Charge Employees Service Rules, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 23 and 309
2000(1)WLC546; 2003(2)WLN232
from time to time. The same includes the Drivers which are entitled for overtime under the provisions of Section 13 of the Act 1948 and the Rule 26 of the Rajasthan Minimum Wages Rules.(v) The employer-State has submitted … has been filed by the State challenging the order dated 31.5.99 passed by the Prescribed Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter called as the Act 1948) allowing the claim of overtime of the respondent-workman.2. The facts and circumstances
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-07-1968
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(2), 12, 13, 14, 18, 20 and 20(2)
[1968(17)FLR266]; (1968)IILLJ750Bom
of certiorari and prohibition, praying for quashing of two orders made by respondent 1, the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, for Neral area. The said authority is also the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba district. … rate of wages fixed by such notification for that class of employees in that employment without any deductions. Section 13 of the Act fixes the hours for a normal working day and S. 14 provides for payment for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWorkmen of the Bombay Port Trust Vs. Trustees of Port of Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Oct-10-1961
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1960 - Rules 23; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 13, 22, 22A and 30; Payment of Wages Act
AIR1962SC481; [1961(3)FLR473]; (1961)IILLJ632SC; [1962]Supp1SCR36
any day of the week because of the Rules in respect of extra payment for over-time work. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 itself contains provisions for contravention of the provisions of the Act or Rules or Orders made thereunder. Section … or Orders made thereunder. Section 22 provides for punishment inter alia for contravention of rules or orders under section 13. Section 22A provides for punishment with fine (which may extend to five hundred rupees) for contravention of any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Workmen of Bombay Port Trust Vs. the Trust of the Port of Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Nov-18-1965
Labour and Industrial
Labour Law; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 13 and 14; Minimum Wages (Control) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24 and 25
AIR1966SC1201; [1970(20)FLR7]; (1966)ILLJ709SC; [1966]2SCR632
order about costs. 16. Appeal dismissed. Labour and Industrial - working hours - Sections 13 and 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Rules 24 and 25 of Minimum Wages (Control) Rules, 1950 - dispute related to existing system of … consider the provisions of the Act and the Rules without drawing any assistance from the Factories Act. 7. Section 13 of the Act does not itself fix the hours of work or rest or overtime. That is done
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter
Gujarat
Sep-19-2006
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227
(2007)IIILLJ122Guj
and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly … in this section shall affect the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (4 of 1936). 19. Section 13, 14 and 15 of the Minimum Wages Act, being relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Rathi B.D.
Mumbai
Apr-25-1962
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)
(1962)IILLJ655Bom
Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … to pay wages at a rate not less than the minimum rate of wages fixed by such notification. Section 13 provides that the appropriate Government may in such cases fix the number of hours or work, which would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-26-1962
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51
AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830
Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. … to pay wages at a rate not less than the minimum rate of wages fixed by such notification. Section 13 provides that the appropriate Government may in such cases fix the number of hours of work, which would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKartikere Gram Panchayat Vs. Sri K K Ramesh Raj Urs
Karnataka
Aug-16-2022
Labour and Industrial
SUB- DIVISION-2 CHIKKAMAGALURU ON DATED288.2013 WHEREIN THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE R-1 HEREIN UNDER SECTION202]. OF THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 WAS ALLOWED AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY THE … rest or for work done on such days under clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13 or of wages at the overtime rate under section 14 to employees employed or paid in that area.”
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCambay Municipality Vs. Vijaykumar Rasiklal and ors.
Gujarat
Jan-30-1980
Criminal
(1980)21GLR857
Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 (Bombay Act No. LXXIX of 1948) was repugnant to Section 13 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and was, therefore, void. He, therefore, dropped all the complaints under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBengal Motion Pictures Employees Union, Calcutta Vs. Kohinoor Pictures ...
Kolkata
Aug-14-1963
Labour and IndustrialConstitution
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 5, 5(2), 9, 13, 13(1) and 27; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Factories Act, 1948 - Section 2; ;Bengal Shops and Establishments Act, 1940 - Sections 2(5), 9 and 10
AIR1964Cal519,(1965)ILLJ387Cal
Sinha J. made on a writ petition quashing a notification dated the 16th May, 1960 issued under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and directing the respondents to forbear from giving effect to the same.2. On 19th May, 1959 the Government … Calcutta Gazette, the Government had no opportunity to fix hours of work for different categories of employees under Section 13 of the Minimum Wages Act. The rule finally came up for hearing before Sinha, J. and by his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »