Advanced Search Results
Lubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter
Gujarat
Sep-19-2006
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227
(2007)IIILLJ122Guj
and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly … on a day of rest at a rate not less than the overtime rate.(2) The provisions of Sub section (1) shall, in relation to the following classes of employees, apply only to such extent and subject to such
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Andhra Pradesh Hotels Association, Rep. by Secretary, G.V. Krishna ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-12-2001
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7 and 9; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)
2001(4)ALT292; (2001)IILLJ1378AP
of minimum wages - Sections 3, 4, 4 (1), 5, 5 (1), 5 (2), 7 and 9 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 3 of Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Articles 19 and 19 (1) of Constitution of India
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRasheed A. Maskati and ors. Vs. Abbas Ali Hussaini M. and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-09-1993
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 2 and 2(4)
(1999)IIILLJ331Bom
Respondent No. 1 filed application No. 28 of 1985 in the Court of Competent Authority appointed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. By the said application, respondent No. 1 claimed difference in minimum wages payable under Item 17 Part-I of … provisions of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 did not apply; that respondent No. 1 was not an employee under Section 2(i) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948; that appellants did not carry on any organised or systematic activity
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India Vs. Rathi B.D.
Mumbai
Apr-25-1962
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)
(1962)IILLJ655Bom
Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … the facts in these application, is would be necessary to note the relevant provisions of the said Act. Section 2(b) defines the expression 'appropriate Government,' and according to that definition, in relation to any scheduled employment carried
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurya Rau V. V., E.D. Nocil and Others Vs. Surendra Ramkrishna Tendulk ...
Mumbai
Feb-03-1997
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour Act - Sections 7, 18, 21, 21(4), 27, 29 and 30; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 7(1) and 18; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 19(4), 20, 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 22C, 22C(1), 22C(2), 22D, 26 and 27
1997BomCR(Cri)505; (1998)ILLJ629Bom; 1998(3)MhLj281
Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28 of the Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963. Apart from the … petitioner in the Court of the 1st Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 18(1), 18(3), 18(2), 19(4) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 read with Rules 27(1), 27(2), 22 and 28
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association Vs. State of Bombay
Mumbai
Sep-23-1958
Labour and IndustrialArbitration
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 12, 12(2), 20, 20(2), 21 and 30(2); State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 122; Industrial Arbitration Act, 1901; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 30; Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidis (Agriculture Purposes) Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 4; Indian Contract Act - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 43, 168, 224(1), 226, 227 and 723; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195
(1959)61BOMLR890; (1959)IILLJ286Bom
issued by the Government of Bombay in Labour and Social Welfare Department, dated 11 June, 1958, under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. That notification runs thus : 'No. MWA. 1557-J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of … Mudholkar, J. 1. This order will also govern Special Civil Application No. 214 of 1958. In these petitions the petitioners challenge
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.T. Singh and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Jharkhand
May-15-2006
Criminal
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1), 18, 19, 22A, 22B and 22B(1); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules 1950- Rules 21(4), 22, 25(2), 26, 26(1), 26(2) and 26(5)
[2006(3)JCR360(Jhr)]
dated 26.8.2002 whereby and whereunder the CJM Jamshedpur took cognizance of the offence under Section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in C/2 case No. 2007/02 now pending in the Court of Miss … and whereunder the CJM Jamshedpur took cognizance of the offence under Section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in C/2 case No. 2007/02 now pending in the Court of Miss
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.S.D. Basha Proprietor Bashas Snuff Co. Vs. State of Madras Represent ...
Chennai
Mar-01-1962
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 9
AIR1963Mad138; (1963)ILLJ29Mad
of the Government dated 27th December 1950, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3(1) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. This fixation was given effect from the date of the notification, namely, 1st March 1951. Since then, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of the Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Chennai
Nov-22-1961
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29, 33-C(1), 33-C(2) and 36-A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923
AIR1962Mad335; (1962)ILLJ493Mad
(2) and 36A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Article 226 of Constitution of India, Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 15 of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - petition seeking quashing of Order … ORDER(1) On the application of the second respondent under s. 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the labour court Coimbatore found that he was a fitter from January 1956, among the staff of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExecutive Engineer (Training), Cpwd Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner a ...
Delhi
Jan-30-2002
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 20(2) and 22; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 25; ;Minimum Wages (Central) (Amendment) Rules, 1960 - Rule 25; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1967
2002VIIIAD(Delhi)216; 96(2002)DLT721; [2002(93)FLR1230]; (2002)IILLJ360Del
for quashing the order dated 17.6.2000 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner, New Delhi, an authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). 4. Respondent No. 2 was appointed as Chowkidar with CPWD on … Snajay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. Rule. 2. With consent of learned counsel for the parties the petition … posted in the offices of the Superintending Engineers/Executive Engineers.' 5. The claim of respondent No. 2 filed under Section 20 (2) of the said Act claiming over time has been allowed by the impugned order. The Regional
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »