Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: minimum wages act 1948 · Page 1 of about 1,738 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 1984

Municipal Council Vs. Shaikh Rahim Shaikh Rustam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ17Bom; 1984MhLJ998

Vaze J.1. Do the previsions of section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, regarding settlement of claims provide theexclusive remedy in supersession of that provided by Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial … Disputes Act, 1947, is maintainable even though the same relief can be claimed under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 9 and 10 of 1982 are directed against this judgment.4. In a catena of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1962

Union of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830

Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. … on the ground that the Authority had no jurisdiction to entertain claims prior to 1957, and that the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was not applicable to the employees-applicants, as these employees are entitled to remuneration as per Prescribed Scale of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1962

Union of India Vs. Rathi B.D.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 51 ; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ655Bom

Chitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the authority), on applications submitted by several employees of the Central Railway. … on the ground that the authority had no jurisdiction to entertain claims prior to 1957, and that the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was not applicable to the employees-applicants, as these employees are entitled to remuneration as per Prescribed Scale of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 2001

Kiran Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Janata Kamgar Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1946

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR494; 2001(4)BomCR550; (2001)3BOMLR180; [2001(89)FLR707]; (2001)ILLJ1499Bom; 2001(4)MhLj665

society to pay them the wages in accordance with the notification Issued by the State Government under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in relation to the employment in establishments or commercial establishments under Entry 17 of Part 1 of the … the employment in establishments or commercial establishments under Entry 17 of Part 1 of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act. 1948.2. We have to bear in mind that the petitioner society is a separate independent and distinct entity and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Food Craft Instt. Vs. Rameshwar Sharma and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 23, 136 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections Sections 2, 10(1), 10A, 11A, 12(5), 17A, 17B, 18B, 20(3), 33(C)(1) and 33(C)(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 136, 151 and 153; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act - Sections 20; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 10A; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 17B

Reported in : 134(2006)DLT49; (2007)2LLJ350Del

payable to a workman.25. It has been urged at great length on behalf of the petitioner that the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is not applicable as its establishment is not scheduled employment for the purposes of the enactment.26. Mr. S.N. … how the constitutional validity of the Exemption Act in so far as it excludes the applicability of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 to the workmen employed in famine relief works can be sustained. Article 23, as pointed out above, mandates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2002

State of Gujarat Vs. Savailal H. Shah

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-27-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR395]; (2003)IILLJ641Guj

99,736.54 ps. to the respondent being the amount of overtime wages as contemplated by Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The facts, as they emerge from the record of the case, may be briefly stated:The respondent was employed … 28, 1986. According to him, he was entitled to overtime wages in terms of Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and prayed the Labour Court to direct the present petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 99,736.54 Ps.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2006

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(3), 2(4), 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25F and 170B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; Security Guards Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abo

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

(2) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (3) The Factories Act, 1948, (4) The Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, (5) Minimum Wages Act, 1948, (6) The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, (7) The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and … not enjoy benefits of regularly employed workmen governed by the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and other enactments and, therefore, relying on the principle of Stare decisis submitted that the settled position in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1968

Union of India Vs. Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1968

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(2), 12, 13, 14, 18, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : [1968(17)FLR266]; (1968)IILLJ750Bom

of certiorari and prohibition, praying for quashing of two orders made by respondent 1, the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, for Neral area. The said authority is also the Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Karjat in Kolaba district. … and the wages alleged to have been paid to them. They also claimed overtime wages alleging that the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, prescribed work for 8 hours a day, whereas they had been made to work for 8(1/2) hours per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Lubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ122Guj

and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly … of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has partly allowed said applications and directed the establishment to pay minimum wages prescribed under the Minimum Wages

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1987

Ramakant Rajmangal Yadav Vs. Ramnilan Vijay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-1987

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Minimum of Wages Act, 1948; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(K)

Reported in : (1987)89BOMLR538; (1993)IIILLJ692Bom; 1987MhLJ994

purview of an Engineering Industry and as per a notification issued by the Government of Maharashtra under the Minimum wages Act, 1948, prescribing the minimum wages for the Engineering Industry with effect from 1st Dec., 1974, they be paid the … in question. In this connection, he referred to Entry No. 36 of the Schedule, Part 1, to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, which read as under:'Employment in engineering industry (not being an employment falling under entry 26 in this Part),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial