Advanced Search Results
Anjani Kumar Pandey Vs. The Regional Labour Commissioner Central and A ...
Jharkhand
Jun-19-2017
Land Acquisition
writ petitions against rejection of their claim for payment of arrears of wages under section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act including compensation in lieu of less payment of wages against the Respondent M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. (herein- after … raised claim for payment of wages and compensation vide claim application no. 9/2013-R.L.C.(R) before the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Ranchi, stating that they have been denied wages @ Rs. 324/- per
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociated Cement Co. Ltd. Madukkarai Cement Works, Madukkarai Vs. Lab ...
Chennai
Sep-15-1959
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 13 and 20(1); Minimum Wages (Amendment) Act, 1957; Minimum Wages (Madras) Rules, 1953 - Rule 23
AIR1961Mad77; (1960)ILLJ192Mad; (1959)1MLJ221
Government at Coimbatore before the Labour Court -- which is the authority constituted under Section 20(1) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 -- for a direction under Sub-section 3 of Section 20, on the allegation that the respondent there, … than the minimum wages had been paid were those employed in lime stone quarries. The violation of the Minimum Wages Act and the rules made there under was stated to consist in failure to pay wages for the weekly
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Associated Cement Co., Ltd., Madukkarai Cement Works Vs. Labour In ...
Chennai
Sep-15-1959
Labour and Industrial
(1960)1MLJ221
Government at Coimbatore before the Labour Court - which is the authority constituted under Section 20(1) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - for a direction under Sub-section (3) of Section 20, on the allegation that the respondent there, … than the minimum wages had been paid were those employed in lime stone quarries. The violation of the Minimum Wages Act and the Rules made thereunder was stated to consist in failure to pay wages for the weekly holidays
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lubi Electricals Ltd. Vs. A.T. Painter
Gujarat
Sep-19-2006
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10(3), 12, 13 to 15, 17, 20(3) and 25; Employees State Insurance Act - Sections 2(22); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 227
(2007)IIILLJ122Guj
referred to as Sthe Management for short) have challenged the judgment given by the Officer appointed under the Minimum Wages Act and Judge, Labour Court No. 14 Ahmedabad dated 19.12.2005 in Minimum Wages Application No. 51/98, 52/98 and 53 … and 53 of 1998 which were filed by the applicant Government Labour Officer under Section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Under the impugned judgment, the labour court and the authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPune Municipal Corporation Vs. Suryakant Pandurang Dharwad
Mumbai
Jul-12-2002
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Minimum Wages (Amendment) Act, 1972
2002(5)BomCR7; [2002(95)FLR559]; 2002(4)MhLj56
Establishments Act, According to Shri Ketkar, in reply to the submissions of Ms. Sarnaik, the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 were also not applicable. He submitted that there was absolutely no pleading or averments in the application … work overtime. According to the learned Advocate, the claim of the employees was under Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act. The Learned Advocate in support of her claim relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commanding Officer, Inhs and anr. and Gopinathan Etc. Etc. Vs. Y.C ...
Mumbai
Nov-23-1993
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 227; Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Sections 20; Minimum Wages Rules - Rule 24
(1994)96BOMLR651; (1995)IILLJ891Bom
August 14, 1987. 2. The Respondents in all these writ petitions filed applications under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, praying that the petitioners be directed to pay them difference in the minimum wages and the wages … in the minimum wages and the wages actually paid to them. According to the respondents, the provisions of Minimum Wages Act apply to them and they are entitled to wages as prescribed underthe Minimum Wages Act. There does not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Jammu and Kashmir and ors. Vs. Abdul Majid
Supreme Court of India
Jan-05-2007
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act
AIR2007SC916; [2007(112)FLR841]; 2007(1)JKJ17[SC]; 2007(2)SCALE113; (2007)3SCC157; 2007AIRSCW661; 2007-I-LLJ820(SC)
by the respondent herein issued the following directions:1) pay to the petitioner minimum wages as payable under the Minimum Wages Act w.e.f. January, 1992 at such rates as were prevalent from time to time.2) petitioner be considered for regularization … High Court directed the State to deposit the wages of the respondent in accordance with the terms of Minimum Wages Act from January, 1992 to ending March, 2006 and pay this amount to the respondent within two weeks from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanwar Devi and ors. Vs. Bansal Roadways and ors.
Delhi
Jan-24-2008
Motor Vehicles
Minimum Wages Act; Motor Vehicles Act
2008ACJ2182
on four grounds. The first is that the Tribunal has not considered the correct wages given under the Minimum Wages Act of a non-matriculate. The second contention raised by the counsel for the appellants is that the Tribunal has … the appellants is that the Tribunal has not given the benefit of increase in the wages under the Minimum Wages Act. The third contention raised by the appellants is that the deceased was survived by a large family of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Dec-14-1999
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20
to challenge the order, dated August 23, 1977 passed by the appellate authority under Section 20(6) of the Minimum Wages Act as amended in this State. By the impugned order the appellate authority set aside the order dated December … claimants only a sum of Rs. 1452/- They accordingly sought a direction from the competent authority under the Minimum Wages Act asking the Corporation to pay to each of the claimants their due wages alongwith compensation ten times of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association Vs. State of Bombay
Mumbai
Sep-23-1958
Labour and IndustrialArbitration
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 12, 12(2), 20, 20(2), 21 and 30(2); State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 122; Industrial Arbitration Act, 1901; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 30; Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidis (Agriculture Purposes) Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 4; Indian Contract Act - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 43, 168, 224(1), 226, 227 and 723; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195
(1959)61BOMLR890; (1959)IILLJ286Bom
issued by the Government of Bombay in Labour and Social Welfare Department, dated 11 June, 1958, under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. That notification runs thus : 'No. MWA. 1557-J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) … by Sub-section (2) of S. 5 read with Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of that section of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (XI of 1948), and after consulting the Advisory Board and in supesession of the former Government of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »