Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act sections 48 mines rules 1952 · Page 1 of about 489 results (0.104 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 10 2005

Ram Kumar Yadav Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Mines Act - Sections 48; ;Mines Rules, 1952

Reported in : [2006(108)FLR786]; 2005(4)MPHT371; 2006(1)MPLJ161

petitioner in the statutory registers was recorded as 25-7-1945. The register is maintained under Section 48 of the Mines Act and Mines Rules, 1952. The petitioner was engaged on 25-7-1975 on which date he shown himself as 30 … of birth of the petitioner in the statutory registers was recorded as 25-7-1945. The register is maintained under Section 48 of the Mines Act and Mines Rules, 1952. The petitioner was engaged on 25-7-1975 on which date

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2003

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(F), 2(K) and 10(1); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(J) and 48; Mines Rules - Rules 48, 51 and 77

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

His final argument is that the petitioner cannot be brought within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 because it is not a 'Mine' within the said definition and therefore the Central Government could not … These 'Form-B' registers, right at the beginning, show that they are under Rules 48, 51, 77 and 77(a) of the Mines Rules. These Form-B' registers … out of a total of 45 Casuals under the Department of Hydrogeology, 48 workers were terminated w.e.f. 30.6.92, 2 workers terminated 'since March, 92' and … the workman on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation contained in that behalf. Sections 2(oo) reads as follows :--'[2(oo) 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2006

Charan Lal S/O Jhawal Vs. Western Coalfield Limited Through Its Chief ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : ServiceLimitation

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 43, 48, 48(1) and 48(3); Mines Rules, 1955 - Rule 77; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ85

statutory form and is required to be filled by the employee in terms of Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952. In this context, Rule 77 of Mines Rules, 1955 may also be taken into consideration. Thus, the … 'B' which is a statutory form and is required to be filled by the employee in terms of Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952. In this context, Rule 77 of Mines Rules, 1955 may also be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 08 2015

Md Jahangir Khan Vs. Ms Central Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairma ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-08-2015

Subject : Education

Form-B supposed to be maintained in terms of the provisions of Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952, Rule-77 of the Mines Rules, 1955 as … mines. The petitioner in this regard referred to the amendment introduced on 31.05.1984 in Section 40 of the Mines Act 1952 stating that before that date there was no minimum age prescribed for employment in the mines. By … under the respondent-Company in mines. The petitioner in this regard referred to the amendment introduced on 31.05.1984 in Section 40 of the Mines Act 1952 stating that before that date there was no minimum age prescribed for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2010

ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union. Vs. the Director, Steel Authority of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Decided on : Sep-06-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Rule 25(2) - Section 10(2), 23, 25 ;

manager on all women employees, more than 1500 in number.Provision of Section 48 of Mines Act, 1952 has also been referred to by the Union … paid similar wages as regular workers for similar work violating the statutory right of the workers under the Mines Act and Under Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (in short "CLRA Act"). Labourers were working in captive … 10(1) of the CLRA Act has been violated by SAIL, the penal consequences have been spelt out in Sections 23 to 25 of CLRA Act. Section 23 provides for penalty of imprisonment for a term which may … the provision of Rule 25(2) of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Central Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "CLRA Rules") to decide whether the type

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2017

Bhagirath Singh Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited Through Its Chairman ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-12-2017

Subject : Education

B' as prescribed under Rule 77 and 77A(2) of Mines Rules, 1955 enacted under Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952 which contains the date of birth of this appellant as 8th February, 1953. Moreover, this statutory 'Form … service excerpt especially 'Form B' as prescribed under Rule 77 and 77A(2) of Mines Rules, 1955 enacted under Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952 which contains the date of birth of this appellant as 8th February,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

land to some other person to mine the minerals.27. Shri Naphade, however, submits that the provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 are applicable and have to be complied with. He referred to the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, … Meghalaya. Shri Naphade submits that jurisdiction of NGT constituted under National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 is confined to Sections 14,15 and 16. Section 16 is not attracted in the present case. Section 14 deals with original jurisdiction … of which the invoice value of the coal has been taken Rs. 4850/- per metric tonne. Thus, we direct that the State Government shall in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1983

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

to which we must refer in this connection is the Mines Act, 1952. This Act extends to the whole of India and therefore applies a … death. No cases are registered against the mine owners or the lessees for violation of safety rules under Mines Act. We are enclosing herewith the statements of about 75 workers who have suffered or are suffering continuously due … abolition of bonded labour system with a view to preventing the economic and physical exploitation of the weaker sections of the people. But, unfortunately, as subsequent events have shown and that is borne out also by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2014

Promoters and Builders Assn. of Pune Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

covered by the provisions of the Rules of 1968. The definition of 'Mine' in Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 and the meaning of the expression 'mining operation' assigned by Section 3(d) of the Act of 1957 … that "excavation activity even for the purposes of laying foundation of the building would still attract rigours of Section 48(7) of the Revenue Code". Under the aforesaid provision of the Code extraction of minerals by any person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2014

Promoters and Builders Assn.of Pune Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

covered by the provisions of the Rules of 1968. The definition of 'Mine' in Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 and the meaning of the expression 'mining operation' assigned by Section 3(d) of the Act of 1957 … that ".excavation activity even for the purposes of laying foundation of the building would still attract rigours of Section 48(7) of the Revenue Code".. Under the aforesaid provision of the Code extraction of minerals by any person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial