Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 88 · Page 1 of about 166 results (0.064 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 1960

The State of Orissa Vs. Iswar Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 20; General Caluses Act - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ori180; 1960CriLJ1355

a correct decision on principle. The Indian Mines Act, 1923 (Act IV of 1923) has been repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act XXXV of 1952) and the Central Government have been empowered to frame … by limitation; and (2) the Indian Minos Act, 1923, (Act IV of 1923), having been repealed by the Mines Act, 1952, (Act 35 of 1932), the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation which was framed under the 1923 Act was no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1957

State of Rajasthan Vs. Pannalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 88; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1958Raj59; 1958CriLJ226

State against the acquittal of Pannalal and eight others of an offence under Section 73 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952 (No. XXXV of 1952) thereinafter called the Act) read with Rules 23 and 71 of the Indian Metalliferous … need not himself consider as a Court whether, in fact, the Regulations were in force. He merely mentioned Section 88 of the Act of 1952 which has provided for repeal and thought that he had done his duty.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1961

Mohan Lal Goenka and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 46, 57, 58, 73 and 88; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 24, 29 and 30; Creche Rules, 1946 - Rules 3, 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1961SC1543; 1961CriLJ713; [1961(3)FLR326]; (1961)IILLJ404SC; [1962]2SCR36

appellants are, (1) that the Mines Creche Rules, 1946, had stood repealed, along with the repeal by s. 88 of the Mines Act of 1952, of the Mines Act, 1923,. under which these rules were admittedly framed … standards of such rooms, and the nature and extent of the supervision to be provided therein." In the Mines Act, 1952, section 58 contains the provision empowering the Central Government to make rules for all or any of the purposes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 20 1957

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. A.K. JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 57 to 62, 73, 74 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 20

Reported in : AIR1958MP162; 1958CriLJ767

with certain modifications as the Mines Act, 1952 (Act No. XXXV of 1952) (hereinafter called the new Act).By Section 88 of the. new Act, which repealed the old Act, no express saving was made with respect to the … regulations and bye-laws made under the Indian Mines Act, 1923 and deemed to have been made under the Mines Act, 1952, read with Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, be quashed.Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 1956 and criminal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2009

Kakinada Municipality Rep. by Its Commissioners Vs. Employees State In ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-20-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 2(9), 2(12), 39, 40, 45, 45(1), 45A, 74, 74(1), 74(4), 75, 75(1), 75(2B), 82, 82(2), 87, 88 and 90; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District Municipalities Act, 1920; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Wage Ceiling Act, 1923; Maternity Act; Fatal Accidents Act; Mines Act, 1952; Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Municipal Subordinate Service Rules; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 32; Andhra Pradesh (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules; Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 31; Employees State Insurance (General) Rules, 1950 - Rules 31 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT623; (2010)ILLJ407AP

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act No. 35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;29. Section 75 of the Act deals with matters … 2(12) of the Act and is coverable under the Act.17. The petitioner is not entitled to exemption under Section 88 or 90 since the benefits provided by them are so inferior to those availableunder the Act. The application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1998

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

effect as if enacted in the Act. The Mines Act 1923 was repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act 1952. The question for consideration was whether the Mines Regulations 1926 framed under Section 29 of the Mines Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2023

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … conversation or literature, there can be no doubt that they are not infrequently used to mean “every one” 88 - not one, but all. Thus we say of any one can see that this is wrong, to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1991

Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-03-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

contended in this show cause notice that according to Col. X of Clause (j) of Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, a 'mine' includes premises or part of the premises thereof, in or adjacent to and belonging to a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2008

Hindustan Copper Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 - Sections 3; Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty (Amendment) Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code - Sections 146

Reported in : AIR2009SC919:2008AIRSCW8249

is carried on at mine pit. This activity is carried on in the mine area registered under the Mines Act, 1952. The second is processing, which is carried on at the Primary Crusher, Secondary Crusher and Concentrator Plant. The … Legislature provides for levy of electricity duty (in short `the duty') on sale or consumption of electrical energy. Section 3 of the Act provides that every distributor of electrical energy and every producer shall pay every month

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any … beneath the land unless there is an express or implied reservation in the grant. In paragraph 13 following 88 has been laid down: Agori and of mahal “13. In our opinion, a reading of the two sanads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial