Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 86 · Page 1 of about 185 results (0.089 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 03 1991

Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-03-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(58)ELT76TriDel

contended in this show cause notice that according to Col. X of Clause (j) of Section 2 of Mines Act, 1952, a 'mine' includes premises or part of the premises thereof, in or adjacent to and belonging to a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1999

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-1999

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

made under section 29 of the Mines Act, 1923 which was repealed and re-enacted with modifications as the Mines Act, 1952. The question posed for the consideration of the Supreme Court was whether subordinate legislation like Regulations or Rules … the land in question was shown in the Town Planning Scheme of Pune. The Town Planning Scheme under section 86 was sanctioned some time in 1989. According to the learned Counsel this is subsequent to the sanction of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1990

Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Krishna Dass

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-08-1990

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 44, 45(2), 85(3) and 86(3); Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 102A

Reported in : 1990(3)KarLJ363; (1999)IIILLJ246Kant

in which the meaning of the expression the 'continuing offence' within the meaning of Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 is expounded. He also placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills … correct provision of law applicable to the plea of limitation taken by the accused in Sub-section (3) of Section 86 of the Act which provides that 'no Court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act except

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2004

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 51, 136, 141, 245, 246, 246(1), 246(2), 246(3), 248, 248(2), 249 to 252, 253, 256, 257, 265, 276, 301, 356 and 366; Cess Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(1) 6 and 18; West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 - Sections 78, 78A, 78(1), 78(2) and 78(2A); West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 4; Cess Act, 1880 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(1) and 72; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 23B(1); West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 2; Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3, 4(2) and 4(2A); West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1981; West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4, 4A , 9, 9(2), 9A, 13(2

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201; [2004] 1 SCR 564

insteadand in place of coal mines but the definitions of mines within the meaningof several Parliamentary Acts including Mines Act, 1952 and the coalbearing lands are in pari materia. Even the definition of despatch underthe impugned Acts and the … 1031)The Parliament can impose excise duty on coal in terms of Entry 86 ofList I. A regulatory fee which would also be in the nature … Organic Chemicals Ltd. and Ors. aDivision Bench of this Court held that having regard to the declarationmade in Section 2 of the 1951 Act the whole field of industrial alcohol andits products being covered, the State Legislatures

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any … as well as by individuals. The owner of the re kynti land is an absolute proprietor. The tenure 86 system in Jaintia Hills classified into two types of lands, namely, Hali /irrigated land and High land. Hali

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2024

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2024

Subject : Electricity

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … this Court in the case of Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (supra). 5770. We have already referred to Section 86(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, which is analogous to Section 79 of the Electricity Act. Section 79 determines the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2023

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … IV. SUBMISSIONS OF UNION OF INDIA…………………… Paras 52 to 78 V. SUBMISSIONS OF THE RBI……………………………… Paras 79 to 86 VI. SUBMISSIONS IN REJOINDER…………………………. Paras 87 to 94 VII. REFRAMED QUESTIONS…………………………………. Paras 95 VIII. STATUTORY SCHEME…………………………………….. Paras 96

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2016

The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. rep. by its Vi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

all the quarries in the mines; and, in the exercise of his powers under Section 22(3) of the Mines Act, 1952, he was prohibiting, until the dangers were removed, employment, in all the quarries in the mine, of all

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2017

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

including that (i) the project is in violation of the provisions of the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 (for short 'Periphery Control Act, 1952'), (ii) that the project is not authorized under the provisions of the … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898. … area of 4,63,144.54 sqm. Landscape will be developed in an area of 86,243.48 sqm. The total parking facility will be provided for 3645 ESS. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2017

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

including that (i) the project is in violation of the provisions of the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 (for short 'Periphery Control Act, 1952'), (ii) that the project is not authorized under the provisions of the … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898. … area of 4,63,144.54 sqm. Landscape will be developed in an area of 86,243.48 sqm. The total parking facility will be provided for 3645 ESS. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial