Advanced Search Results

P.C. Agarwala Vs. Payment of Wages Inspector, M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCompany

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 7A, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4) and 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1983; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 9, 36, 61, 64A and 67; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 15; Madhya Pradesh Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 2 and 3; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 7(1) and 85(1); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 219, 228 and 405; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17), 40, 85B and 85C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006SC3576; [2005]127CompCas787(SC); (2005)6CompLJ227(SC); [2005(107)FLR826]; JT2005(8)SC544; 2005(7)SCALE519; (2005)8SCC104; [2005]63SCL109(SC); 2006(1)SLJ24(SC)

'mine' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (j) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 ( 35 of 1952);(iii) 'plantation' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (f) of Section 2 of … employer under Section 40.5. The Employees' State Insurance Act does not define the term 'employer' although under Sections 85B and 85C of that Act the term 'employer' is used.10. Therefore, even if we read the definition of

The Employees State Insurance Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nagar Nigam Allahab ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a railway running shed;16. Section 2(14-AA) defines “manufacturing process”: “2. (14-AA) “manufacturing process” shall … June, 2006 was issued to the respondent-Nagar Nigam calling upon it to explain as to why damages under Section 85B of the Act of 1948, should not be levied upon it. The respondent-Nagar Nigam chose not to appear

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-i Vs. M/s. Bombay Rayon Fashi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : MRTP

in para 5 to 7 as under:-"5. Section 14B of the Act 1952 which is pari materia to Section 85B of the Act, 1948 is reproduced hereunder: “14B. Power to recover damages.-Where an employer makes default in the … his contention, he drew our attention to Section 10F of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1958, which uses the words 'damages … for fastening the liability on the employer under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1952' for short) and after examining a series of it's own rulings has