Advanced Search Results

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

despatches of coal and coke, is null and void being ultravires the Bihar Legislature since by virtue of Mines & Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957 (Central Act 67 of 1957), the Union has assumed complete control … provisions of the impugned Bihar Act under consideration has a striking similarity with Orissa Mining Area Development Fund Act, 1952, the vires of which came up for consideration by the Supreme Court in the leading case of Hingir … was in pith and substance a duty of excise under item No. 84 of List I of the 7th Schedule and, therefore, the levy of … 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India necessitate a consideration:(1) Whether Section 89(1) of the Bihar Coal Mining Area Development Authority Act, 1986 (Bihar

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

as an excavation in the earth for the purpose of obtaining minerals.188 The expression was defined under the Mines Act 1952 to primarily mean any excavation for the purposes of searching for or obtaining minerals189 and to include the … Entry 23 of List II and Entry 54 of List I ................... 84 i. Meaning of “regulation of mines” and “mineral development”...................... 84 ii. Analysis … F. Whether royalty is tax ............................................................................................ 48 i. Royalty under the MMDR Act ............................................................................. 48 ii. Purpose of Section 9 of the MMDR Act ............................................................. 54 iii. Contours of a mining lease ................................................................................ 56 a. Lease and

The Hingir-rampur Coal Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 372; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950

Reported in : AIR1961SC459; [1961]2SCR537

colliery has been determined at 3341.79 acres. In its appeal filed under rule 3 before the Director of Mines the first petitioner objected to the issue of the said notification, inter alia, on the ground that the … filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution in which the validity of the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952 (XXVII of 1952), is challenged. The first petitioner is a public limited company which has its registered office … is the nature in which duty of excise is levied under Entry 84 in List I. The said Entry empowers Parliament to impose duties of … subject to the terms and conditions prescribed by it. 2. Pursuant to section 5 of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1951, all the right, title

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any … in the above case was entirely different which did not directly pertain to environmental degradation. Whether NGT has 84 jurisdiction to entertain a particular cause is a question which depends on the facts of each case. To

The Continental Construction Company (incorporated Under the Indian Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor, Mineral Concessions Rules - Rule 5(1); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 39; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(L); Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD95; 2008(4)ALT209

contractor does not come within the meaning of 'owner' of the quarry as defined under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and in which case he is under no obligation to pay seigniorge fee. A further contention has been … B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 questioning the order dated 5.1.20.00 passed in O.P.No.14 of 1990 on

Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Bhag Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1989P& H1; (1989)IILLJ126P& H

or is ordinarily so carried on but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), or a railway running shed; 'and further stated that the expression 'manufacturing process' and 'power' … which is reported in Bhag Singh v. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. (1982) 84 Pun LR 605 : (1983 Lab 1C 412), in which the learned … the Act. When proceedings were sought to be initialed on that basis, the respondent filed an application under Section 75 of the Act before the Employees' State Insurance Court, Chandigarh, praying for a declaration that the coverage

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

including that (i) the project is in violation of the provisions of the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 (for short 'Periphery Control Act, 1952'), (ii) that the project is not authorized under the provisions of the … pleased to direct that the aforesaid Land W.P.(C) Nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 Page 84 of 169 Acquisition Collector, Chandigarh, shall proceed take possession of the waste … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898.

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

including that (i) the project is in violation of the provisions of the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 (for short 'Periphery Control Act, 1952'), (ii) that the project is not authorized under the provisions of the … pleased to direct that the aforesaid Land W.P.(C) Nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 Page 84 of 169 Acquisition Collector, Chandigarh, shall proceed take possession of the waste … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898.

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … may be specified in the notification, any series of bank notes of any denomination shall cease to be 84 legal tender save at such office or agency of the Bank and to such extent as may be

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Mining Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5 and 5(2) - Order 40, Rule 1; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(1), 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 26 and 29; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1980Bom168

also referred to the definition of the word 'owner' as defined in Section 2 (1) (1) of the Mines Act, 1952, and submitted that the word 'owner' is not used as owner of the articles under the definition of