Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 81 · Page 1 of about 199 results (0.086 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2006

Hotel Neelkamal, Through Its Prop. Shri Kamal Singh Verma, S/O Shri Am ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-2006

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Hotel Tatha Vas Grihon Me Vilas Vastuon Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1988 - Sections 6; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 27(6) and 81; Sales Tax Act - Sections 3, 11A, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 24A, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 33B, 33C, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 45A, 45B, 46, 47, 47A, 48 and 51; Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act - Sections 8, 8(1) and 13; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Probation Act - Sections 13(2), 18 and 19; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 360 and 562; Madhya Pradesh Vanijya Kar Adhin

Reported in : (2007)5VST260(MP)

should be construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in Clause (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 Act. Consequently, the references to Section 562 of Old Code in Section 19 … to a minimum of five hundred rupees.M.P.G.S.T. Act was repealed by M.P. Vanijya Kar Adhiniyam, 1994 w.e.f. 1.4.1995. Section 81 is in respect of repeal and savings which reads thus:81. Repeal and saving - The Madhya Pradesh General

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2009

C.V. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-27-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 146(1), 146(2), 158 and 159A; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; ;Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947; ;Arms Act, 1959; ;Opium Act, 1978; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; ;Patents Act, 1970; ;Copy Rights Act, 1957; ;Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Central Excise Act, 1944; ;Foreign Exchange Management Act, 2000; ;Indian Explosives Act, 1884; ;Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 81, 8

Reported in : 2009(171)LC254(Madras); 2010(249)ELT324(Mad)

(State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch & Co.) considered the issue as to whether on the enactment of Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, the demand notice issued on 1.8.1960 under the Orissa Mining Areas … 1.8.1960 under the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, (Act 27 of 1952) is valid after the supersession of the Act. It is held that … to expressly retain in Chapter VI itself their right of renewal as the same was already provided in Section 81 of the Act corresponding to Section 68F(1-D) of Chapter IV-A of the Repealed Act. The reason appears to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2012

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-26-2012

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 3, 4; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 11(2), 11(4), 17A, 17A(3), 2, 4(3), 4A, 15, 10(1), 13(2)(e), 16(1)(b), 17(1), 17A(1)(A), 18A(6), 21(5), 28, 30, 11, 7, 16(1), 9, 13(2)(a), 13, 18A(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Rules 1960 - Rule 59(2), 58; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 84, 85, 86, 3, 4(a); Central Act 67 of 1957 - Sections 16(1)(b), 17, 13, 9; U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 ; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;

for by the appellants in their writ petitions were for quashing (i) the decision of the Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand contained in the letter dated September 13, 2005 whereby the State Government sought … Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd.a was concerned with the question of the validity of Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952. Inter-alia, the contention raised on behalf of the petitioners was that even if the cess imposed thereunder was … the State and its consequences. The State Government has been empowered under Section 3 to declare that the estates or tenures of a proprietor or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2017

Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) (respondent No.2 herein) commenced inquiry/investigation on 06.01.1996 under Section 23(2) of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Based on the inquiry report dated 12.02.1996 submitted by respondent No.2, a … such draft bye-laws becomes obligatory. Chapter IX provides for penalties and procedure and it covers Sections 63 to 81 of the Act. As the appellants herein along with other accused persons were charged for offences under Sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2006

Srinivasa Rice Mill Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 2(4), 2(9), 2(12), 2(22), 38 to 45, 75(1), 76, 77, 78, 79, 81 82 and 85; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 10B; ;Mines Act, 1952; Mines Act, 1952; Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR233]; JT2006(10)SC305; 2006(11)SCALE694; 2006(2)LC1485(SC)

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;'Employee' and 'wages' have been defined in Sections 2(9) and (22)2 … (except Sub-section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall … action will be taken accordingly without any further notice. Suits were filed before the Employees' Insurance Court under Section 75(1)(g) of the Act. The question which inter alia was raised therein was as to whether the aforementioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1993

Pwd Sc, St and Obc Employees Council and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-16-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25(F), 25(G) and 33(1); Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 81; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 20, 21, 22 and 25(N)

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ1192Bom

of the Factories Act, 1948, (ii) a mine as defined in Clause (j) of Sub-section (2) of the Mines Act, 1952; or (iii) a plantation as defined in Clause (f) of Section 2 of the Plantation Labour Act, 1951; … and, therefore, needed to be retrenched. The allegation made in the complaint that there was non-compliance of Rule 81 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules was also traversed. It was pointed out that because of the economic

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2024

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

as an excavation in the earth for the purpose of obtaining minerals.188 The expression was defined under the Mines Act 1952 to primarily mean any excavation for the purposes of searching for or obtaining minerals189 and to include the … into general and taxing entries.35 In the Union List, entries 1 to 81 enumerate general subject matters, while entries 82 to 92-C pertain to the … F. Whether royalty is tax ............................................................................................ 48 i. Royalty under the MMDR Act ............................................................................. 48 ii. Purpose of Section 9 of the MMDR Act ............................................................. 54 iii. Contours of a mining lease ................................................................................ 56 a. Lease and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1962

Kalipada Chowdhury Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : AIR1963SC134; [1963(6)FLR393]; (1963)ILLJ303SC; [1963]2SCR904

the alleged contravention of the provisions of Regulation 127(3) of the Coal Mines Regulations, 1957, framed under the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) (hereinafter called the Act). By their petition filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution, the … the Coal Mines Regulations framed by opponent No. 1 in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by section 57 of the Act, the same having been previously published as required by sub-section (1) of s. 59 … or they may have to decided cases sent to them under s. 81. Section 59 which speaks of reference of the rules and regulations to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2019

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

empowers the District Magistrate to institute prosecution against any owner, agent or manager for any offence under the Mines Act, 1952. Section 75 is 121 as follows:- “75. Prosecution of owner, agent or manager.--No prosecution shall be instituted against any … before the State Government pointing out environmental degradation and the Tribunal having taken up the issue, the submission 81 on behalf of the State that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction is not expected from the State Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial