Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 77 · Page 1 of about 214 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2006

Charan Lal S/O Jhawal Vs. Western Coalfield Limited Through Its Chief ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : ServiceLimitation

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 43, 48, 48(1) and 48(3); Mines Rules, 1955 - Rule 77; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ85

statutory form and is required to be filled by the employee in terms of Section 48 of the Mines Act, 1952. In this context, Rule 77 of Mines Rules, 1955 may also be taken into consideration. Thus, the form

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2003

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(F), 2(K) and 10(1); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(J) and 48; Mines Rules - Rules 48, 51 and 77

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

His final argument is that the petitioner cannot be brought within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 because it is not a 'Mine' within the said definition and therefore the Central Government could not have … instant Writ Application. These 'Form-B' registers, right at the beginning, show that they are under Rules 48, 51, 77 and 77(a) of the Mines Rules. These Form-B' registers are to be maintained in every mine as per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2009

Regional Director, Esi Corporation Vs. G. Sivaprasad, Proprietor, M.S. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-15-2009

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 1(5), 1(6), 2, 2A, 2(9), 2(12), 2(13), 2(22), 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 45A, 45A(2), 45B, 45C to 45I, 75 to 77, 82(2) and 85; Evidence Act - Sections 101 and 102; Apprentice Act, 1961; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1989; Reserve bank of India Act, 1934; Kerala Industrial Establishment Act, 1958; The Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulations 10B, 11, 12 and 29 to 40

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ279Ker

power or is ordinarily so carried on,but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;The above definition shows that in the case of a premises … application filed as I.C. 10/2000 by the respondent/employer under Sections 75 to 77 of the Act.The Background Facts2. The facts leading to the impugned order … V. Ramkumar, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), the Regional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 27 2009

Syndicate Marine Enterprises Vs. Regional Director, Employees State In ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948- Sections 2, 2(9), 45A and 77; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ81Bom

of power or is ordinarily so carried on, but excluding a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (Central Act 35 of 1952). or a railway running shed or an establishment which is exclusively engaged in … the rejection of the application filed by the appellant before the Employees State Insurance Court at Margao under Section 77 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows:The Inspector

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2005

Tata Projects Limited Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation and an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 17(4), 32(2), 39, 40, 41, 41(1), 45, 75, 76, 77 and 77(1); Andra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 1(5), 2(12), 44, 45A, 45B, 77, 77(1), 77(1A), 96 and 97; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD791; 2005(5)ALT502

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act No. 35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;)Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner establishment is … as it is not a 'shop' or an 'establishment'. It is further stated that under Clause (b) of Section 77 of the Act, it is not open for the respondent Corporation to make a demand after five years

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2012

The Assistant Director Employeesand#8217; State Insurance Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed.” In the Factories Act, 1948, definition of ‘factory’ under Section … of Rs.1,05,658/-. Thus, the claim of total amount of Rs.2,79,940/- was made. The Appellant filed an Application under Section 77 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 before the Employees’ State Insurance Court for challenging the coverage under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2012

The Assistant Director Employees’ State Insurance Corporation and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed.” In the Factories Act, 1948, definition of ‘factory under Section … of Rs.1,05,658/-. Thus, the claim of total amount of Rs.2,79,940/- was made. The Appellant filed an Application under Section 77 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 before the Employees State Insurance Court for challenging the coverage under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1998

Souther Agencies Vs. Andhra Pradesh Employees State Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-17-1998

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(5), 2(9 and 12), 14, 15, 76 and 77; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1956; Shop Act - Sections 2(5); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD15; 1998(2)ALT731

power or ordinarily so carried on but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed'.10. It has been the contention of the appellant that on the wake of … ensued between the parties culminating in an application under Sections 76 and 77 of the Act seeking a declaration that the provisions of the Act … of the most comprehensive legislations in the field of social security to safeguard the interest of the working section of the people of the country has, however, its origin as early as 1927 at the Tenth Session

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2015

Employees State Insurance Corporation, Through its Deputy Regional Dir ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

1948 in as much as the said Act is applicable to Factories and Mines, as defined under the Mines Act, 1952. In short, it was contended that the Head Office of the respondent, where the administrative work is carried … No.7 of 2005. By the impugned judgment, ESI Court has allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 77 of the Act of 1948, thereby holding that the respondent establishment is not liable to pay the contribution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2006

Srinivasa Rice Mill Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 2(4), 2(9), 2(12), 2(22), 38 to 45, 75(1), 76, 77, 78, 79, 81 82 and 85; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 10B; ;Mines Act, 1952; Mines Act, 1952; Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR233]; JT2006(10)SC305; 2006(11)SCALE694; 2006(2)LC1485(SC)

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;'Employee' and 'wages' have been defined in Sections 2(9) and (22)2 … Chapter V and VI (except Sub-section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of … action will be taken accordingly without any further notice. Suits were filed before the Employees' Insurance Court under Section 75(1)(g) of the Act. The question which inter alia was raised therein was as to whether the aforementioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial