Advanced Search Results

Banwarilal Agarwalla Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Coal Mines Regulations, 1957; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 10; Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 59(3) and 76; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1961SC849; [1961(3)FLR253]; (1961)IILLJ140SC; [1962]1SCR33

as a result of which 23 persons lost their lives. After an inquiry under s. 24 of the Mines Act, 1952, into the causes of and the circumstances attending the accident, and the publication of the report of the … regulations 107 and 127 of Coal Mines Regulations - appeal against dismissal Order of High Court - contended Section 76 violated Article 14 and Regulations of 1957 framed in contravention of Section 59 (3) - provisions of Section

Karuna Kant Datt and ors. Vs. the Coal Board and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1009

the owner, as I have said, means the company but not the directors personally. Mr.' Roy refers to Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952. where it has been said that where the owner of a mine is … the word 'owner' will have the same meaning as the word 'owner' in Section 3 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952. Clause (1) of Section 3 contains the definition of owner. It is not disputed that in the case

Kewal Krishan Puri and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 3(9), 5, 6(1), 7, 9, 10, 10-A, 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 23, 25, 26, 27(1), 27(2) and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 110 and 199; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 76 and 76(I); Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952; Calcutta Municipal Act - Sections 548(2); Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment) Act, 1975; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : AIR1980SC1008; (1980)1SCC416; [1979]3SCR1217

words it was upheld as a 'fee' in respect of regulation of mines and mineral development. Gajendragadkar J., as he then was, delivered the judgment … and Ors. : [1961]2SCR537 the challenge was to the cess levied by the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952. The petitioners' stand in the first instance was that the cess levied was not a fee but a … . The point decided therein was that the provision relating to the payment of annual contribution contained in Section 76(1) of the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 is a tax and not a fee and

Souther Agencies Vs. Andhra Pradesh Employees State Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(5), 2(9 and 12), 14, 15, 76 and 77; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1956; Shop Act - Sections 2(5); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD15; 1998(2)ALT731

power or ordinarily so carried on but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed'.10. It has been the contention of the appellant that on the wake of … of correspondence ensued between the parties culminating in an application under Sections 76 and 77 of the Act seeking a declaration that the provisions of … of the most comprehensive legislations in the field of social security to safeguard the interest of the working section of the people of the country has, however, its origin as early as 1927 at the Tenth Session

The India Cements Limited Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Dir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ484

of the mines attached to the respective cement manufacturing units for the purpose of Section 76 of the Mines Act 1952. the brief facts leading to the writ petition may be summarized as follows.2. The petitioner namely The India

The Chief Inspector of Mines and anr. Vs. Lala Karam Chand Thapar Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Indian Coal Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 31(4); Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(I), 73, 74 and 76; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1961SC838; [1961(3)FLR241]; (1961)IILLJ146SC; [1962]1SCR9

regulations of the Indian Coal Mines Regulations, 1926. This report was duly published under s. 27 of the Mines Act, 1952. Thereafter, on March 3, 1956, the Government of India informed the manager and the agent of the colliery … raise a difficult question about the interpretation of the word 'any one of the directors' in s. 76 Section 76 is in these words :- 'Determination of owner in certain cases :- Where the owner of a mine

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the

Srinivasa Rice Mill Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 2(4), 2(9), 2(12), 2(22), 38 to 45, 75(1), 76, 77, 78, 79, 81 82 and 85; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 10B; ;Mines Act, 1952; Mines Act, 1952; Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR233]; JT2006(10)SC305; 2006(11)SCALE694; 2006(2)LC1485(SC)

or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;'Employee' and 'wages' have been defined in Sections 2(9) and (22)2 … and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI (except Sub-section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act

Narendramal S/O Mishrimal Bafna Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Factories Rule - Rule 4(1); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 7, 7A(2) and 92; Mines Act - Sections 18 and 76

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)490; 2001CriLJ1667

statutes in favour of the accused.Hence the words 'any one of the directors' in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952, must be interpreted to mean 'every one of the directors'.10. The contention of the learned counsel for the