Advanced Search Results
The State of Mysore Vs. P.C. Sarangapani Mudaliar and ors.
Karnataka
Jul-08-1958
PropertyConstitution
Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 74; ;Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulations 38, 39, 40, 41, 43(1), 45 and 91; General Clauses Act - Sections 24
AIR1960Mys245; 1960CriLJ1227
was somewhat different. That case arose out of certain prosecutions under Ss. 73 and 66 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952 and there the point was raised that the rules and regulations framed under the old Act were no … offences punishable under Regulations 38, 39, 40, 43(1) and 45 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations read with Section 74 of the Indian Mines Act of 1952.All the respondents pleaded not guilty to the several charges when the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Keshavlal Amrutlal Ozha and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-21-1957
Property
Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 24(4), 74 and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438
AIR1958Bom243; (1958)60BOMLR551; 1958CriLJ756; ILR1959Bom358
Dhanbad and the Regional Inspector of Mines, Chhindwara. Similarly, notices of the accident under Section 23(1) of the Mines Act, 1952, were also given immediately.3. Early In May 1956, the Regional Inspector of Mines directed Bhankaran (P.W. 1), an … the non-applicants had committed breaches of regulations 96 and 146 and had thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 74 of the Mines Act. A complaint was lodgedby the Regional Inspector of Mines on 25-6-1956. Thereupon both the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. A.K. JaIn and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-20-1957
Criminal
General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 57 to 62, 73, 74 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 20
AIR1958MP162; 1958CriLJ767
107 of 1957, in so far as the tenability of the prosecutions are concerned under Sections 73 and 74 of the Mines Act (Act No. XXXV of 1952). This order will dispose of the criminal revisions completely … regulations and bye-laws made under the Indian Mines Act, 1923 and deemed to have been made under the Mines Act, 1952, read with Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, be quashed.Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 1956 and criminal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Banwarilal Agarwalla Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-10-1961
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Coal Mines Regulations, 1957; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 10; Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 59(3) and 76; Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1961SC849; [1961(3)FLR253]; (1961)IILLJ140SC; [1962]1SCR33
76 of Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 and Article 14 of Constitution of India - complaint for offence under Section 74 of Act of 1952 for contravention of regulations 107 and 127 of Coal Mines Regulations - appeal against … as a result of which 23 persons lost their lives. After an inquiry under s. 24 of the Mines Act, 1952, into the causes of and the circumstances attending the accident, and the publication of the report of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chief Inspector of Mines and anr. Vs. Lala Karam Chand Thapar Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-10-1961
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Indian Coal Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 31(4); Mines (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 2(I), 73, 74 and 76; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24
AIR1961SC838; [1961(3)FLR241]; (1961)IILLJ146SC; [1962]1SCR9
complaint alleged that by the violation of the regulations mentioned therein the accused persons had committed offences under Sections 73 and 74 of the Mines Act, 1952. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate took cognizance of the offences, and issued … regulations of the Indian Coal Mines Regulations, 1926. This report was duly published under s. 27 of the Mines Act, 1952. Thereafter, on March 3, 1956, the Government of India informed the manager and the agent of the colliery
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-14-1980
Constitution
Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac
AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406
incumbrances. Parliament instead of providing that the word 'mine' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952 has given an enlarged definition of 'mine' in Section 2(h) so that not merely the colliery but everything
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKakinada Municipality Rep. by Its Commissioners Vs. Employees State In ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-20-2009
Labour and Industrial
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 2(9), 2(12), 39, 40, 45, 45(1), 45A, 74, 74(1), 74(4), 75, 75(1), 75(2B), 82, 82(2), 87, 88 and 90; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District Municipalities Act, 1920; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Wage Ceiling Act, 1923; Maternity Act; Fatal Accidents Act; Mines Act, 1952; Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Municipal Subordinate Service Rules; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 32; Andhra Pradesh (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules; Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 31; Employees State Insurance (General) Rules, 1950 - Rules 31 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226
2009(3)ALT623; (2010)ILLJ407AP
or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (Act No. 35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;29. Section 75 of the Act deals with matters … under Section 75 falls under Chapter VI of the Act which contemplates adjudication of disputes and claims. Under Section 74 of the Act, the state Government by issuance of notification in the Official Gazette constitute the employees' Insurance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE.P.F.Commissioner Vs. O.L.of Esskay Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-08-2011
Company
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 11, 2(e), 7A, 8F, 14B, 15(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 529A, 530(1), 442 and 537; Presidency- towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Section 49; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Section 61; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Section 230; The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Section 33-C ; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 ; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, - Section 14A; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Section 74; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Section 25; Gift Tax Act, 1958, - Section 30; State Fina
different States as also Section 14A of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Section 11 of the EPF Act, Section 74 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, Section 25 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, … to the dues payable by an employer under Section 11 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, `the EPF Act') is subject to Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, `the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Prasad Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Jul-29-2016
Land Acquisition
the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers … aside the judgment dated 03.09.2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge- Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal nos. 73 of 2007, 74 of 2007 and 76 of 2007 whereby and whereunder the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.03.2007 passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhusudan Banerjee Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Jharkhand
Jul-29-2016
Land Acquisition
the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers … aside the judgment dated 03.09.2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge- Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal nos. 73 of 2007, 74 of 2007 and 76 of 2007 whereby and whereunder the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.03.2007 passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »