Advanced Search Results

State (Union of India (Uoi)) Vs. V.L. JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 72C and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201

Reported in : AIR1982MP97

criminal case are that a complaint (Criminal Case No. 2638/73) for certain contraventions of the provisions of the Mines Act. 1953 was filed in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhindwara on behalf of the State (Government of … occurred on 9th Mar. 1973 resulting in the death of a worker and the complaint was filed under Section 72C(1) and punishment is sought under this provision for the loss of life and in this view of the

Ganeshgir S/O Sukhagir and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 43 and 304A; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 72C(1); Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 113

Reported in : AIR1966MP311; 1966CriLJ1273

of the Mines Act and the Regulations framed thereunder relevant for purposes of these petitions are as under:'Section 72C. Mines Act:-- (1) Whoever contravenes any provision of this Act or of any regulation, rule or by-law or … Section 304A, Indian Penal Code, is incompetent, since the negligence attributed to them is made punishable under the Mines Act which being a special law excludes the operation, if any, of the Indian Penal Code. In fact, it

T. Yesuratnam and ors. Vs. the Director of Mines Safety, Government of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 72-C(1) and 79

Reported in : 1997(6)ALD89; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)928; 1998CriLJ201; 1997(2)LS324

first respondent herein filed complaint against the petitioners for an offence under sections 72(A) and 72(C)(1)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu alleging that the first petitioner is the Mining Sirdar, the … death or bodily injuries to any employee therein, then only the question of filing of the complaint under Section 72C of the Mines Act will arise. She further submitted that the concerned Officer visited the mine on 30-9-1994

K.K. Sharan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2C, 72C(1), 73 and 75; Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 - Regulations 36(1), 42(1), 44(8), 57(3) and 112; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286, 288, 304A, 337, 338 and 447

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR481(Jhr)]

No. 134/96. Thereafter Director of Mines and Safety, Koderma region also investigated the matter under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 to know the causes and circumstances which led to the accident and on final conclusion of his investigation, … ORDERH.S. Prasad, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire criminal case against the

Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) (respondent No.2 herein) commenced inquiry/investigation on 06.01.1996 under Section 23(2) of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Based on the inquiry report dated 12.02.1996 submitted by respondent No.2, a … persons, first four are the public servants. In the complaint, prosecution for non-cognizable offences punishable under Sections 72A, 72C(1)(a) and 72C(1)(b) of the Act was sought. The trial court took cognizance of this complaint. Trial started with

State Vs. IndersaIn Ahuja and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ358

the Hon'ble Ramabhadran, J. on the ground that since the question of limitation under Section 79 of the Mines Act 1952 has arisen and therefore, these two appeals be decided by a Division Bench.2. Government Appeal No. 1517 of … 1966 in which, Indrasain Ahuja. Chandrasain Ahuja and Ammer Kalam were prosecuted under Sections 66, 69, 70 and 72C(i)(a) read with Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the Mines Act. 1952 on the complaint lodged on 17-2-1966

Maj. Genl. A.S. Gauraya and anr. Vs. S.N. Thakur and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 203, 249, 256(1), 367 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1986SC1440; 1986CriLJ1074; 1986(3)Crimes1(SC); 1987(3)KarLJ112; 1986MPLJ438(SC); 1986(1)SCALE1128; (1986)2SCC709; [1986]2SCR771; 1986(1)LC654(SC)

the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, New Delhi, disclosing an offence punishable under Section 67 and 72C(l)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952, read with Regulation 106 of the Metallifarous Mines Regulation 1961. The learned Magistrate took the complaint on file

Sk. AlauddIn @ Alai Khan Vs. Khadiza Bibi @ Mst. Khodeja Khatun and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 125

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2035,I(1992)DMC268

Gauraya's case also there was a complaint disclosing an offence punishable under Sections 67 and 72C(l)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952. Unquestionably, these two were criminal proceedings. Whereas the proceeding in Jagir Kaur's case was a proceeding under Section

Suhird Kamra Vs. Neeta and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 1988(14)DRJ282; 1988RLR200

of Criminal Procedure. In this case there was a complaint filed under Sections 67 and 72C(I)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952 and on a certain date fixed for appearance of the accused neither the complainant nor the accused was … D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) The petitioner husband has filed this petition-seeking to quash the proceedings against him filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) by his wife and his daughter the

Umesh Mahato and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

other officials of the colliery were made accused under the provisions of Sections 73 and 72C(1)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952. It fact the allegations which have been made against the petitioner relates to failure in ensuring suitable self … 2 in which the petitioner and other officials of the colliery were made accused under the provisions of Sections 73 and 72C(1)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952. It fact the allegations which have been made against the