Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter … Shri Bobde pointed out instances of provisions for making of such orders by reference to Section 22 and 72(b) of the Mines Act, 1952 and to Regulations Nos. 65, 101, 103 and 128 of the Coal Mines

T. Yesuratnam and ors. Vs. the Director of Mines Safety, Government of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 72-C(1) and 79

Reported in : 1997(6)ALD89; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)928; 1998CriLJ201; 1997(2)LS324

first respondent herein filed complaint against the petitioners for an offence under sections 72(A) and 72(C)(1)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu alleging that the first petitioner is the Mining Sirdar, the … came to the knowledge of the Inspector, etc. 9. At this juncture, it is relevant to refer to Section 72 of the Mines Act and it reads as under :- '....... 72-C : Special Provision for contravention of

Regional Inspector of Mines Vs. K.K. Sengupta and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1671; 1973MPLJ559

quarry with a total disregard of the safety provisions of the Metalliferous Mines Regulations. 1961, framed under the Mines Act. 1952. Non-applicant No. 3 was at the relevant time said to be one of the partners of the contractors … the regulations under the Mines Act, the non-applicants are punishable under Section 72(I) (a) and (c) of the Mines Act. 1952 read with Section 18 … non-applicant No. 1 K. K. Sengupta and non-applicant No. 2 V. G. Sesh, of the Central Government under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was taken, the case could not proceed against both of them

Jaikrishna Kamla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

the revisional court, the applicants counsel by referring the provision of section 72-C, 75 and 79 of the Mines Act, 1952 ( in short the Act) argued that in the matter like present one, the prosecution could be entertained

K.K. Sharan and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2C, 72C(1), 73 and 75; Coal Mines Regulation, 1957 - Regulations 36(1), 42(1), 44(8), 57(3) and 112; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286, 288, 304A, 337, 338 and 447

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR481(Jhr)]

No. 134/96. Thereafter Director of Mines and Safety, Koderma region also investigated the matter under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 to know the causes and circumstances which led to the accident and on final conclusion of his investigation, … filed a complaint petition on 11.4.1997 before ACJM Tenughat under Sections 73, 72-C(1)(a) and Section 72-C(1)(b) of Mines Act, 1957 alleging contravention of Regulations 57(3), … ORDERH.S. Prasad, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire criminal case against the

Mahendra Prasad Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers

Madhusudan Banerjee Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers

Binoy Kumar Mishra Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers

Nageshwar Sharma Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the accused persons are severally and vicariously liable for punishment under Section 72(c)(1)(a) and 72(c)(1)(b) respectively of the Mines Act, 1952. After the accident, an inquiry was conducted by competent authority and during inquiry, 21 persons including injured labourers

State Vs. P.N. Kakkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1092

filed against the accused persons on the allegation that they committed offences punishable under Section 72-A of the Mines Act, 1952.2. By that order, the learned Magistrate upheld the contention of the learned defence lawyer challenging the maintainability of