Advanced Search Results

The Continental Construction Company (incorporated Under the Indian Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor, Mineral Concessions Rules - Rule 5(1); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 30 and 39; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1)(L); Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD95; 2008(4)ALT209

contractor does not come within the meaning of 'owner' of the quarry as defined under the provisions of Mines Act, 1952 and in which case he is under no obligation to pay seigniorge fee. A further contention has been … it could not be set aside on the ground that the arbitrator acted contrary to the provisions of Section 70 of the Contract Act. In the third cited decision, the Supreme Court held that when a Court is

The Deputy Director of Mines (Safety) Vs. P. Nagbhushanam and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ549

petitions are these: The accused in these cases were charged under Sections 70, 72-C(1)(b) and 73 of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Regulations, 1961. The accused raised a preliminary point, that the … facts that have given rise to these petitions are these: The accused in these cases were charged under Sections 70, 72-C(1)(b) and 73 of the Mines Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Regulations,

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

effect as if enacted in the Act. The Mines Act 1923 was repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act 1952. The question for consideration was whether the Mines Regulations 1926 framed under Section 29 of the Mines Act … in its place(Also refer page 79 of Jameshedpur Motor Accessories Stores v. U.O.I. 1991 ITR 189 at page 70 (Patna)]. In C.Anmachalam v. Commissioner of Income Tax 1 LR (1984) 2 Kar 1387. a full Bench of

The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. rep. by its Vi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

all the quarries in the mines; and, in the exercise of his powers under Section 22(3) of the Mines Act, 1952, he was prohibiting, until the dangers were removed, employment, in all the quarries in the mine, of all … 20.08.1992 which refers to the existence of deep trenches with vertical slopes upto a height of 60 to 70 feet without any benches. The plaintiff's letter in Ex.A-55 dated 06.12.1993 also refers to the complaint lodged by

D.N. Ghosh and anr. Vs. Additional Sessions Judge and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 245; ;Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 9; ;Coal Mines Act, 1952 - Section 2(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal208,63CWN147,(1959)ILLJ587Cal

of the Act. The Indian Mines Act 1923 has now been repealed and we have now 'the Coal Mines Act 1952' being Act XXXV of 1952. 'Owner' therein has been defined in Section 2, Clause (1) as follows: 'Owner, … a subordinate legislation like this is easily passed. In my opinion, Section 9 is not ultra vires and Section 70 of the scheme is not an unconstitutional exercise of a delegated power. This point therefore fails. 13. The

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … contexts, it is capable of meaning “every one of the Directors”. It held that which of these two 70 meanings was intended by the legislature in any particular statutory phrase has to be decided by the courts

Tata Steel Limited Through Its Chief Legal and Compliance Mrs Meena La ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

instead Section 3(i) says that the expression ‘mine’ has the same meaning as assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952. ‘Mine’ as defined by Section 2(1)(j) of Mines Act, 1952 means any excavation where any operation for the

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. National Union Wa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1) and (2), 12, 12(1), 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(4), 23, 24 and 25; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 23, 32, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 43A and 226; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) (Amendment) Act, 1986; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 5-A; Companies Act, 1956; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 - Sections 3-A; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 5-A and B; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956; Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 - S

Reported in : AIR2001SC3527; [2001(91)FLR182]; (2002)1GLR792; JT2001(7)SC268; 2001LabIC3656; (2001)IILLJ1087SC; 2001(5)SCALE626; (2001)7SCC1; 2001(4)SCT1(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC228; 2001DGLS(soft)1084:2001(111)CLR349

to them in Clause (i), Clause (j) and Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act 1952 (35 of 1952).74. It contains four parts. Under the first part, the head of any office or department

Sri S. Santhanam, I.A.S. and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 9, 10, 20 and 21; Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta (Investigation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 2 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226, 246(1) to 246(3), 248, 309, 312 and 320; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 3(1); All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rule 8; Indian Administrative Service Cadre Rules, 1954 - Rule 4(1); Indian Administrative Service Officers (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulation, 1955

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT666

question was whether the Orissa Mining Areas-Development Fund Act, 1952 became repugnant and unenforceable with the enactment of Mines and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957. The Orissa Act was enacted by virtue of the legislative powers … personal right'.18. The Supreme Court while considering the scope and applicability of Section 8-B of Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 to the petitioners therein, also, referred to the caution uttered by the Lord to Arjun in Bhagwad Gita … of the Constitution of India and this enactment is referable to Entry 70 of List I of the VII Schedule to the Constitution. While recognising