Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 68 · Page 1 of about 255 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 14 1980

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

incumbrances. Parliament instead of providing that the word 'mine' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Mines Act, 1952 has given an enlarged definition of 'mine' in Section 2(h) so that not merely the colliery but everything … New Satgram and New Majri, and as on that day, the outstanding dues from sundry debtors were Rs. 68.74 lacs, further that from January 31, 1973 to April 30, 1973 i.e., during the period of management, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2024

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2024

Subject : Electricity

question as to whether the phrase “any one of the Directors” as found in Section 76 of the Mines Act, 1952 could mean “only one of the Directors” or could it be construed to mean “every one of the … to elect Directors to fill any vacancy on the Board’. The Directors issued a notice to convene a 68 meeting for the other object and held the meeting. Then the shareholders, under the Companies Clauses Act, 1845,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2015

The Paristhithy Samrakshana Janakeeya Samithy, rep. by its Patron P.P. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

securing environmental clearance and without there being any approved mining plan. It is submitted that provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1961 Regulations") are also required to be followed … recommendations of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. (viii) As per Rule 68 no mining/quarrying operations can be permitted without there being an approved mining … which causes perpetual threat to human life. The private respondents have not secured permission to use machinery under Section 233 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Blasting and firing are done within the dangerous zone of 300

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 1996

M.C. Mehta Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 24, 32, 37, 39, 41, 45 and 47; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 45; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 14; Employment of Children Act, 1938

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)582; AIR1997SC699; (1997)3GLR2306; (1997)IILLJ724SC; 1996(9)SCALE42; (1996)6SCC756; [1996]Supp9SCR726; 1997(1)LC243(SC)

and will be in the charge of his father of other adult near male relative.(iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … also expressed similar views in his book 'Child Labour in India'. In the article at pages 65 to 68 of 1993(3) SCJ (Journal Section) titled 'Causes of the exploitation of child labour in India', Dr. Amar Singh

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1974

B.M. Lakshmanamurthy Vs. the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1974

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 2(13) and 2(17)

Reported in : AIR1974SC759; [1974(28)FLR223]; (1974)ILLJ304SC; (1974)4SCC365; [1974]3SCR142

or is ordinarily so carried on. But does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed.* * *9. By Section 2(13) 'immediate employer', in relation to employees employed by … 44 every principal and immediate employer has to submit returns to the Corporation and maintain registers and records.18. Section 68 provides for Corporation's rights where a principal .employer fails or neglects to pay any contribution. By Section 72

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1983

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Pyrites, Phosphates and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-1983

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1983)LC391DTri(Delhi)

the mines and hence they come within the definition of the mine as per Section 2(1)(j) of the Mines Act, 1952. Shri Kampani claimed that the crushers are exclusively used for crushing the refuse of the pyrites and that … for the manufacture of A.G. Pyrites and also to pay duty under the Central Excise Tariff Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Act. Thereafter on 29-8-1981 a show cause notice was also issued to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1998

Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC631

effect as if enacted in the Act. The Mines Act 1923 was repealed by Section 88 of the Mines Act 1952. The question for consideration was whether the Mines Regulations 1926 framed under Section 29 of the Mines Act … vehicle accessories and fittings and embellishments of suit-cases and trunks falling under T.I. No. 34A and Item No. 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. Prior to 27.1.1981, they had no central excise licence, as required under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2006

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors. and Krishna Kamal Prasad @ Krishna Kant Pra ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-14-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 105, 106 and 119; Bihar Factory Rule, 1950 - Rules 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 11; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 - Rules 9 and 21

are doing their Mining operation in their lease hold areas for which they are at liberty under the Mines Act, 1952, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 as well as under the BMMC Rules, 1972. Learned Counsel … at Sasaram, in Official Case Nos. 67/2002 8. 68/2002, whereby cognizance has been taken for the offences under Sections 6 and 7 of the Factory Act punishable under Section 92 of the Factory Act against these Petitioners.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2002

Oil India Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC21

gas. The LPG plant is treated as part of mine under Clause 2(j) of Section 26 of the Mines Act, 1952. Natural gas associated with crude oil, is separated from crude oil at the oil collecting stations for supply … and to produce before the department as and when required. The product was classified under Tariff Item No. 68 vide Trade Notice No. (Tech) 128/81 dated 27.11.81 of the Additional Collector, Cen-1, CEX, Shillong. On 23.8.1983 Superintendent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1983

Hutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-1983

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1983)LC701DTri(Delhi)

is ordinarily so carried on, - but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or..." 4. The contention is that the Hatti Gold Mines is a "mine" falling within … Collector of Central Excise, Bellary held that the gold fell under Item 68 of the 1st Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act (hereinafter … 1. This is a Revision Application to the Government of India which, under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, '1944, has been, transferred to the Tribunal for being disposed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial