Advanced Search Results
Vinod S. Panicker Vs. Sub Inspector of Police and Another
Kerala
Sep-05-2012
Land Acquisition
2012(4)KLT314
say so since statutory interdictions as under Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948, Section 45 of the Mines Act, 1952 etc. have significance only in relation to employment of children in hazardous activities. Whereas Section 67 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Srirama Babu Vs. the Chief Secretary to the Government of Karnataka ...
Karnataka
Jun-06-1997
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 24, 39, 41, 45 and 226; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 6 and 67; Karnataka Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988 - Regulations 7.01 and 8.01; Karnataka Rules - Rule 4; Municipalities Act - Sections 256; Child Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 14, 15 and 18; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 40 and 45; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1951 - Sections 21; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3(3); Plantation Labor Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 24
ILR1997KAR2269; 1998(1)KarLJ191
will be in the charge of his father or other adult near male relative'. (iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:-- '(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … thereof have been culled out in the abovesaid judgment of the Supreme Court. In particular, they are: '(i) Section 67 of Factories Act, 1948: 'Prohibition of employment of young children.--No child who has not completed his fourteenth year
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and anr. Vs. Chanan Mal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-1976
Constitution
Haryana Minerals (Vesting of Rights) Act, 1973; Constitution of India - Articles 31(A), 32 and 133; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 16(1); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 2
AIR1976SC1654; [1976(32)FLR353]; (1977)1SCC340; [1976]3SCR688
mineral deposits; Section 3(i) lays down:the expressions, 'mine' and 'owner', have the meanings assigned to them in the Mines Act, 1952. 7. Sections 4 to 9 of the Central Act deal with general restrictions on propecting and mining operations. … Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1954, made under the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation of Development) Act 67 of 1957 (here in after referred to as 'the Central Act'). Learned Counsel for the appellant State contended
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.C. Mehta Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-10-1996
Labour and Industrial
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 24, 32, 37, 39, 41, 45 and 47; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 24; Merchant Shipping Act, 1951 - Sections 109; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 45; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 21; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 14; Employment of Children Act, 1938
1996IXAD(SC)582; AIR1997SC699; (1997)3GLR2306; (1997)IILLJ724SC; 1996(9)SCALE42; (1996)6SCC756; [1996]Supp9SCR726; 1997(1)LC243(SC)
and will be in the charge of his father of other adult near male relative.(iv) Section 45 of Mines Act, 1952:(1) No child shall be employed in any mine, nor shall any child be allowed to be present … As on today, the following legislative enactments are in force prohibiting employment of child labours in different occupations:(i) Section 67 of Factories Act, 1948:Prohibition of employment of young children-No child who has not completed his fourteenth year shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Ardeshir Hormusji Bhiwandiwala
Mumbai
Oct-10-1955
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 17, 34, 35, 44, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 67, 69, 79, 92, 106 and 112; Bombay Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Factories Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(3); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1954; Mines Act, 1952; Public Health Act, 1875 - Sections 4; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925
AIR1956Bom219; (1956)58BOMLR66; 1956CriLJ488; ILR1956Bom321; (1956)IILLJ26Bom
or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952, or a railway running shed'. It is thus clear that in the Factories Act of 1948 the words … provisions to the workers in buildings, they intended to deny these advantages to the workers on Salt pans? Section 67 which prohibits the employment of young children, Section 69 which refers to certificates of fitness and Section 79
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Agarwala Vs. Payment of Wages Inspector, M.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-2005
Labour and IndustrialCompany
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 7A, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4) and 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1983; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 9, 36, 61, 64A and 67; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 15; Madhya Pradesh Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 2 and 3; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 7(1) and 85(1); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 219, 228 and 405; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17), 40, 85B and 85C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 2
AIR2006SC3576; [2005]127CompCas787(SC); (2005)6CompLJ227(SC); [2005(107)FLR826]; JT2005(8)SC544; 2005(7)SCALE519; (2005)8SCC104; [2005]63SCL109(SC); 2006(1)SLJ24(SC)
'mine' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (j) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952 ( 35 of 1952);(iii) 'plantation' has the meaning assigned to it in Clause (f) of Section 2 of … that the lay off was illegal and directed the Company to withdraw the same. On being moved under Section 67 read with Section 64A of the MPIR Act, the Industrial Court by order dated 2.5.1992 modified the same.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSebastian O. a. vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Nov-30-2023
say so since statutory interdictions as under Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948, Section 45 of the Mines Act, 1952 etc. have significance only in relation to employment of children in hazardous activities. Whereas Section 67 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaj. Genl. A.S. Gauraya and anr. Vs. S.N. Thakur and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-1986
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 203, 249, 256(1), 367 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151
AIR1986SC1440; 1986CriLJ1074; 1986(3)Crimes1(SC); 1987(3)KarLJ112; 1986MPLJ438(SC); 1986(1)SCALE1128; (1986)2SCC709; [1986]2SCR771; 1986(1)LC654(SC)
the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, New Delhi, disclosing an offence punishable under Section 67 and 72C(l)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952, read with Regulation 106 of the Metallifarous Mines Regulation 1961. The learned Magistrate took the complaint on file
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSk. AlauddIn @ Alai Khan Vs. Khadiza Bibi @ Mst. Khodeja Khatun and or ...
Kolkata
Dec-05-1990
Family
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 125
1991CriLJ2035,I(1992)DMC268
Gauraya's case also there was a complaint disclosing an offence punishable under Sections 67 and 72C(l)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952. Unquestionably, these two were criminal proceedings. Whereas the proceeding in Jagir Kaur's case was a proceeding under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuhird Kamra Vs. Neeta and anr.
Delhi
Dec-09-1987
CriminalFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
1988(14)DRJ282; 1988RLR200
of Criminal Procedure. In this case there was a complaint filed under Sections 67 and 72C(I)(a) of the Mines Act, 1952 and on a certain date fixed for appearance of the accused neither the complainant nor the accused was … D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) The petitioner husband has filed this petition-seeking to quash the proceedings against him filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) by his wife and his daughter the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »